• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: lightening pics

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "lightening pics"

Collapse

  • SamDisht
    replied
    Magnificent

    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Tooks them last night... couple of trees down. Now the temperature is zooming back up again this morning already hit 28c.



    The snaps are amazing.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I'm not claiming x or y. To me making adjustments means sitting there for 5-10 minutes correcting stuff. What did I do exactly? Corrected the white balance with a little curve.

    There was no photoshopping. The glow comes from the fact those were 30 second exposures. There was many flashes in the clouds before a strike.
    Scooter has been found out for lying. Again, can we trust anything this man child says about Brexit. I for one would not argue with the moderators if they changed Scooties signature to "Lying Bastardo".

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Take your pick. Why do some people like to claim they did no adjustments in a certain area, then when challenged admit that they did some.

    I'm not surprised togs get bad rep for "photoshopping"
    I'm not claiming x or y. To me making adjustments means sitting there for 5-10 minutes correcting stuff. What did I do exactly? Corrected the white balance with a little curve.

    There was no photoshopping. The glow comes from the fact those were 30 second exposures. There was many flashes in the clouds before a strike.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Only curves adjustments were made,...
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Sharping ... did increase it a little post processing.
    Take your pick. Why do some people like to claim they did no adjustments in a certain area, then when challenged admit that they did some.

    I'm not surprised togs get bad rep for "photoshopping"

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Nice! Can you get one of you flying a kite next time?

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    using a prime lens, actually a fixed lens so no changing that. I hate LR. Sharping is reduced by default but did increase it a little post processing.

    I'm not really into post processing to be honest, don't have the time. Those pics are what remained from over 80-100 that were taken.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Only curves adjustments were made, when I reset to the raw image the trees are still glowing!
    What software are you reviewing the files in? It's not the dreaded Lightroom by any chance - it automatically applies "corrections" even to RAW files.

    Do you see the same issues in the RAW file if opened in your camera manufacturer's own software (as long as you still have the original that hasn't been opened in LR).

    The normal cause of luminous aberration is over sharpening, which could be in camera (check your settings - even with RAW) or post processing software. With photoshop you can "defringe".

    ...all of this assumes you are using a prime lens with no filters and no HDR/Low light boost

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
    Far too much PP on #1, lay off the highlight/whites sliders, the trees look like they are glowing.
    Only curves adjustments were made, when I reset to the raw image the trees are still glowing! It was one of those storms where there was strikes nearly every second - the ones you could see and the ones you could not, i.e. just lighting up the clouds.

    Leave a comment:


  • rl4engc
    replied
    Far too much PP on #1, lay off the highlight/whites sliders, the trees look like they are glowing.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    I wouldn't want to be lightening those pics of lightning. They don't need lightened.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Nice! Can you get one of you flying a kite next time?
    This one?

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Nice! Can you get one of you flying a kite next time?

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    started a topic lightening pics

    lightening pics

    Tooks them last night... couple of trees down. Now the temperature is zooming back up again this morning already hit 28c.



    Last edited by scooterscot; 2 August 2017, 11:02.

Working...
X