Originally posted by scooterscot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: lightening pics
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "lightening pics"
Collapse
-
Scooter has been found out for lying. Again, can we trust anything this man child says about Brexit. I for one would not argue with the moderators if they changed Scooties signature to "Lying Bastardo".Originally posted by scooterscot View PostI'm not claiming x or y. To me making adjustments means sitting there for 5-10 minutes correcting stuff. What did I do exactly? Corrected the white balance with a little curve.
There was no photoshopping. The glow comes from the fact those were 30 second exposures. There was many flashes in the clouds before a strike.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm not claiming x or y. To me making adjustments means sitting there for 5-10 minutes correcting stuff. What did I do exactly? Corrected the white balance with a little curve.Originally posted by WTFH View PostTake your pick. Why do some people like to claim they did no adjustments in a certain area, then when challenged admit that they did some.
I'm not surprised togs get bad rep for "photoshopping"
There was no photoshopping. The glow comes from the fact those were 30 second exposures. There was many flashes in the clouds before a strike.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostOnly curves adjustments were made,...Take your pick. Why do some people like to claim they did no adjustments in a certain area, then when challenged admit that they did some.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostSharping ... did increase it a little post processing.
I'm not surprised togs get bad rep for "photoshopping"
Leave a comment:
-
using a prime lens, actually a fixed lens so no changing that. I hate LR. Sharping is reduced by default but did increase it a little post processing.
I'm not really into post processing to be honest, don't have the time. Those pics are what remained from over 80-100 that were taken.
Leave a comment:
-
What software are you reviewing the files in? It's not the dreaded Lightroom by any chance - it automatically applies "corrections" even to RAW files.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostOnly curves adjustments were made, when I reset to the raw image the trees are still glowing!
Do you see the same issues in the RAW file if opened in your camera manufacturer's own software (as long as you still have the original that hasn't been opened in LR).
The normal cause of luminous aberration is over sharpening, which could be in camera (check your settings - even with RAW) or post processing software. With photoshop you can "defringe".
...all of this assumes you are using a prime lens with no filters and no HDR/Low light boost
Leave a comment:
-
Only curves adjustments were made, when I reset to the raw image the trees are still glowing! It was one of those storms where there was strikes nearly every second - the ones you could see and the ones you could not, i.e. just lighting up the clouds.Originally posted by rl4engc View PostFar too much PP on #1, lay off the highlight/whites sliders, the trees look like they are glowing.
Leave a comment:
-
Far too much PP on #1, lay off the highlight/whites sliders, the trees look like they are glowing.
Leave a comment:
-
I wouldn't want to be lightening those pics of lightning. They don't need lightened.
Leave a comment:
-
This one?Originally posted by barrydidit View PostNice! Can you get one of you flying a kite next time?
Leave a comment:
-
lightening pics
Tooks them last night... couple of trees down. Now the temperature is zooming back up again this morning already hit 28c.

Last edited by scooterscot; 2 August 2017, 11:02.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Today 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Yesterday 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Jun 24 06:25
- Andy Burnham as prime minister ‘would cut both ways for self-employed contractors’ Jun 23 02:18
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 22 15:52
- Taxman tells contractors that only four new tax avoidance schemes needed avoiding in Q2 Jun 22 05:47
- VAT compliance checks are changing — here’s what contractors need to know Jun 17 07:30
- As HMRC steps up VAT compliance activity, how should company directors prepare? Jun 16 06:52
- Hiring of IT contractors returned to growth in May 2026, following 33 months ‘in the red’ Jun 15 06:02

Leave a comment: