Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Interesting Torygraph article
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Interesting Torygraph article"
Collapse
-
30% was about what we reckoned, wasn't it? And didn't we all predict that contractors would leave the public sector in droves? Oh, and in case you hadn't noticed, public sector rates are being cut. You couldn't make this tulip up...
-
You reckon I haven't aldready bought her one then? I will be buying her a second one when she settles in the new job.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostShe only needs another 3000% to afford a house then....
Leave a comment:
-
Or as happened in PS client I started in post-April:-
1. Declare all contractors "inside" and tell them rates are not rising.
2. Most contractors leave because of rate, inability to claim expenses, and possibility of retrospective action.
3. Client thinks "bugger we're screwed no".
4. Client raises rates by 35% to account for contractors additional tax liability.
5. Contractors (like me) say ok then.
Admitedly, its hassle using an umbrella now but my take home is roughly the same as it was before. Of course, client has to pay 35% more which is then taken off me in tax.
Leave a comment:
-
Crikey, wonders will never cease. The comments actually look sensible and apparently well informed!Originally posted by barrydidit View PostTry pressing the 'show comments' button...
Unlike some Daily Mail commenters, especially (saddest of all) the gibbering baboons who seems to think their input on physics articles (Black Holes and suchlike) adds any value.
Leave a comment:
-
[emoji13]Originally posted by barrydidit View PostTry pressing the 'show comments' button...
Leave a comment:
-
Try pressing the 'show comments' button...Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostHuh? AFAIK the Telegraph, unlike the Daily Mail, don't host reader comment sections below articles, and I could see none below that article.
(That's one reason they are losing money hand over fist.)
Leave a comment:
-
Huh? AFAIK the Telegraph, unlike the Daily Mail, don't host reader comment sections below articles, and I could see none below that article.Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostSome good comments at the bottom of the article.
(That's one reason they are losing money hand over fist.)
Leave a comment:
-
Don't be silly. Maybe a flat, no way a house.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostShe only needs another 3000% to afford a house then....
Leave a comment:
-
Every cloud etc........Originally posted by SueEllen View PostContractors working for public sector see income slashed by up to 30pc in wake of tax crackdown
In short contractors working in the public sector have lost 30% of earnings and their is a brain drain.
My Daughter is very happy. She has just been offered a new job in the civil service and landed a near 40% pay rise. So, it isn't all bad.
Leave a comment:
-
Some good comments at the bottom of the article.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostContractors working for public sector see income slashed by up to 30pc in wake of tax crackdown
In short contractors working in the public sector have lost 30% of earnings and their is a brain drain.
Leave a comment:
-
Every cloud has a silver lining. Put rates up 30% to operate inside. Challenge the tax paid after the contract and win a bonus from HMRC.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIn short contractors working in the public sector have lost 30% of earnings and their is a brain drain.
Leave a comment:
-
Seems a few departments are self harming to prove a point.
I really don't know what that point is but I'm sure it will make itself known soon...
Plenty of outside work around elsewhere though
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Today 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17

Leave a comment: