Not sure if I read it on here, but if the EU doesn't do a recprocating agreement, when these "4m" or so EU citizens reach the stage where they need new hips, hospital treatment etc, who pays for that?
Presumably they are working over here, so are paying into the system, and not their home countries system, which is where the difficulties lie. So that needs to be dealt with, if you work here, you pay into the UK system of NI and Tax. Or will the UK be billing the EU for the costs of looking after EU citizens because they decided to not agree a reciprocal arrangement?
That would cost the EU potentially billions.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "EU prepares to move two agencies from London"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostIndeed - Darmy hasn't heard of "sub-letting".
As for "coming home, most of the 1 million "over there" are financially independent (property-owning retirees etc), so don't care about benefit rights. The people I know who have property in Europe don't think Brexit will make much difference - it all depends on how vindictive the EU decides to be, though. Guess we'll find out soon enough.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostYawn. It's not the EU being vindictive, it's the UK government not offering to look after its own citizens abroad. Teresa May could quite easily say that she will guarantee to pay for all current and future pensions, hospital treatment, etc for all UK citizens in Europe.
But she won't, because you're simply making it up about most of them being financially independent. I've seen the documentary "Benidorm", most of them are slackers, crims on the run, or old people with gammy hips that sponge off the state and expect something for nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostIndeed - Darmy hasn't heard of "sub-letting".
As for "coming home, most of the 1 million "over there" are financially independent (property-owning retirees etc), so don't care about benefit rights. The people I know who have property in Europe don't think Brexit will make much difference - it all depends on how vindictive the EU decides to be, though. Guess we'll find out soon enough.
But she won't, because you're simply making it up about most of them being financially independent. I've seen the documentary "Benidorm", most of them are slackers, crims on the run, or old people with gammy hips that sponge off the state and expect something for nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lost It View PostSo if we "Mirror image" the requirements, it effects the EU just as much. Erm. What's the issue again?
That building can and will be put to other use. Those workers can and will get other work. There's plenty out there. And as it appears the EU don't wish to reciprocate the situation where EU citizens can stay over here as long as UK citizens get the same rights in the EU area, there's potentially 4 million people going "home" and 1 million coming home. That's lots of empty houses, and lots of work spaces to fill.
All good where I'm sitting.
As for "coming home, most of the 1 million "over there" are financially independent (property-owning retirees etc), so don't care about benefit rights. The people I know who have property in Europe don't think Brexit will make much difference - it all depends on how vindictive the EU decides to be, though. Guess we'll find out soon enough.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostThere are a couple of other points not reported by the media about the EMA moving. Part of the agreement that the UK has with the EU to have the EMA in the UK was that the UK would underwrite the lease on their building which means that when they move, the UK have to pay the owners of the lease the balance. The building is leased until 2039 and so it looks like that the taxpayer will be paying in the region of 300m in order to get rid of an agency that the Brexiters no longer want!
Secondly, it is not just the staff working in the EMA that will have to move or leave but each company that wants to sell drugs in the EU requires a person responsible for certain activities and that person tends to have a team. The problem here, is that this responsible person has to be in an EU country, you can see where this is going can't you? Oh dear...
That building can and will be put to other use. Those workers can and will get other work. There's plenty out there. And as it appears the EU don't wish to reciprocate the situation where EU citizens can stay over here as long as UK citizens get the same rights in the EU area, there's potentially 4 million people going "home" and 1 million coming home. That's lots of empty houses, and lots of work spaces to fill.
All good where I'm sitting.
Leave a comment:
-
There are a couple of other points not reported by the media about the EMA moving. Part of the agreement that the UK has with the EU to have the EMA in the UK was that the UK would underwrite the lease on their building which means that when they move, the UK have to pay the owners of the lease the balance. The building is leased until 2039 and so it looks like that the taxpayer will be paying in the region of 300m in order to get rid of an agency that the Brexiters no longer want!
Secondly, it is not just the staff working in the EMA that will have to move or leave but each company that wants to sell drugs in the EU requires a person responsible for certain activities and that person tends to have a team. The problem here, is that this responsible person has to be in an EU country, you can see where this is going can't you? Oh dear...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostSpending their hard earned in the UK.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostLots of people at the European Medicines Agency doing the grunt work are non-EU citizens.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI hope it was serious and prevents you from posting.
Actually no not really but made you'll never get those 20 seconds back.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: