Oi Fritz, we have been doing laws since way before you were born.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...als-May-Brexit
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Donald Tusk dreams UK will stay in the EU"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostYes, as Darmy says it was probably a complete coincidence. The real question is why the EU should lend a US company the cash to build a factory in a non-EU country? It goes against all of their protectionist agenda. Unless there's another agenda...
I mean, they were never a "quality" vehicle, the new ones I hear from trades of daft things going wrong, door panels coming off, gearboxes failing, door locks failing, which might be a consequence of them stopping being a box with a steering wheel that has some handy storage in the back, but they certainly don't hold as much kit as they used to.
Leave a comment:
-
There's been talk of Jaguar opening a plant in the East for years now...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostYes, as Darmy says it was probably a complete coincidence. The real question is why the EU should lend a US company the cash to build a factory in a non-EU country? It goes against all of their protectionist agenda. Unless there's another agenda...
You know it was actually the EIB (albeit an EU institution of which the major shareholders are the EU countries, including the UK which along with 3 others are the largest shareholders) and the fact it was a loan which has to be repaid and was for Ford to enlarge the factory making Transits which they done in Turkey since 2003. Maybe other banks in the UK shouldn't make loans to foreign companies...
More on that Ford loan (note: not a grant as the eurosceptics would have everyone believe) here: Focus on Ford: The £80m EU loan for Ford's Turkish Transit plant (From Daily Echo)
And then again: European Investment Bank loan of GBP 340 million for Jaguar Land Rover
Which is being hailed as a British success in light of Brexit...and there's quite a few more of these stories out there....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostYes, as Darmy says it was probably a complete coincidence. The real question is why the EU should lend a US company the cash to build a factory in a non-EU country? It goes against all of their protectionist agenda. Unless there's another agenda...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lost It View PostTrue enough. Until Ford got the loan there was no evidence, only rumours that the factory at Southampton was closing. Consequences. It was making money, supporting a local economy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostTranslation: He needs our cash, Juncker's just placed another bulk deal with his wine merchant...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by milanbenes View PostMordy, mate, as Squarepeg said, he's only being polite, and trying to give you all an opportunity to save face, keep your pride and shift from the hole you are all digging and mistake you're walking in to.
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
Parliamentary arithmetic doesn't add up for a Hard Brexit. The Tory MPs Anna Soubry, Nicky Morgan, Kenneth Clark and the Scottish Conservatives will vote it down. Kenneth Clark even voted against article 50. Anna Soubry has repeatedly said that she is waiting for an important vote to sabotage it. The GE was the chance for a Hard Brexit and they blew it. The name of the game is delaying tactics, where the House of Lords will play its role as well , i.e. push the UK into a transitional deal and kick the can into the long grass until "Brexit" has blown itself out.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7805581.htmlLast edited by BlasterBates; 24 June 2017, 09:24.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lost It View PostThey must also be relieved that our funds can't be used to support the building of a factory to make Ford Transits in Turkey instead of Southampton. Ford took a grant from the EU to do that. Just to make this clear.
The UK paid money into a fund to remove a manufacturing plant out of the UK.
Things like this make people like me vote leave.
A related claim by Pro-Brexit Euro-MP Daniel Hannan that “the EU gave Ford a grant to relocate from Southampton to Turkey” is tendentious. In 2012 Ford did receive a loan from the European Investment Bank (EIB), an EU institution, of around £150 million for a factory in Turkey. The loan was not to relocate, as Hannan says, though it occurred around the same time as Ford chose to close its factory in Southampton.
...
Notably, the bank lent Ford £450 million in 2010 to develop a new generation of greener vehicles in the UK.
Leave a comment:
-
They must also be relieved that our funds can't be used to support the building of a factory to make Ford Transits in Turkey instead of Southampton. Ford took a grant from the EU to do that. Just to make this clear.
The UK paid money into a fund to remove a manufacturing plant out of the UK.
Things like this make people like me vote leave.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostI would suggest that the reason 52% voted against the status quo is precisely because they consider the potential upside better than the current down side.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: