• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What would abolishing tution fees REALLY cost?"

Collapse

  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    And Germany educates foreigners for more or less free, and in English too. People here would think that was insane, but maybe they think by encouraging students to go there many will settle and Germany benefits from an influx of bright young graduates. In Britain the attitude is "It's discustin. Why should I have to pay for somebody else!".

    If I were 18 again I know what I'd do.

    A number of American students come over to Germany to avoid fees.

    How US students get a university degree for free in Germany

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    What would abolishing tution fees REALLY cost?

    Free places to study medicine and engineering - but if you want to study philosophy or media studies you have to pay.

    Let's fund stuff that matters, not Micky Mouse homeothapy!

    Leave a comment:


  • MeMeMe1966
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

    Anyway the reason to means test is because the Duke of Westminster will have no problems putting his children through uni but someone in care doesn't have that same back up. And it's more cost effective for us as a society to give that care kid a lift so they can get a decent job then his children.
    Is it more cost effective to put the care kid through uni rather than the smartest kid?

    I'm not necessarily disagreeing just checking that we've accounted for all the variables.


    So presumably you are saying that poor kids who wouldn't qualify within a merit based system and aren't prepared to self-fund through loans would be more incentivised to go to uni & get a job, thus not relying on benefits which is what would otherwise happen.

    But wouldn't the state also benefit if all the people entering universities started out at a higher level? Wouldn't competition for the 20% free uni places make for everyone entering uni a bit smarter or better educated? If they started out smarter then possibly might the leaving grades improve as well? So more firsts, more 2:1, less 2:2, etc.? And won't smarter people entering the workforce boost the economy more?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    We were talking about people who already go to university and what they should do instead.
    Do an apprenticeship then get a Masters degree. Result you have experience and a degree.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    We were talking about people who already go to university and what they should do instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Millions of jobs? And then when you've been a waiter and haven't got a degree, what are you going to do?
    As automation gathers pace there will be fewer and fewer jobs to do. The very notion of employment will be challenged to some degree. It's going to be very challenging.

    You are aware not everyone is capable of getting a degree?

    Even then there are some people who do well without one while others do badly with one.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    And Germany educates foreigners for more or less free, and in English too. People here would think that was insane, but maybe they think by encouraging students to go there many will settle and Germany benefits from an influx of bright young graduates. In Britain the attitude is "It's discustin. Why should I have to pay for somebody else!".

    If I were 18 again I know what I'd do.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Crikey, sounds like you're going native! An apprenticeship?
    That's it!

    It's frustrating, sometimes you just don't remember the word or cannot convey the meaning. But an Ausbildung is not exactly like an apprenticeship, somehow it's different. And there's a respect for people who've worked years gaining their ausbildung whereas in the UK it is almost the reverse. Culture / attitude as much as anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    Plenty of jobs in Retail, hotels and restaurants. Teaches some basic stuff like responsibility and interaction with coworkers/management usefull in any other job later in life. Actually making money instead of debt in the process.
    Millions of jobs? And then when you've been a waiter and haven't got a degree, what are you going to do?
    As automation gathers pace there will be fewer and fewer jobs to do. The very notion of employment will be challenged to some degree. It's going to be very challenging.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    A "reality check" in the BBC suggest that the government would have to put aside an extra £11bn a year to pay for tuition fees, although once those who do not pay back their loans is factored in, this falls to £8bn a year.
    When tuition fees were brought in, did it save the government £11b a year? If so, where has this money gone?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    FTFY.
    .. what do you call an ausbildung in English? Ich wergessen.. whereby you learn on job but get a recognised qualification at the end.
    Crikey, sounds like you're going native! An apprenticeship?

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    If less people went to uni what would they do instead? We have fewer and fewer menial/manual jobs. The idea that you don't start work until 21 is rather attractive
    Plenty of jobs in Retail, hotels and restaurants. Teaches some basic stuff like responsibility and interaction with coworkers/management usefull in any other job later in life. Actually making money instead of debt in the process.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    If less people went to uni what would they do instead? We have fewer and fewer menial/manual jobs. The idea that you don't start work until 21 is rather attractive

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    You guys are missing the point. Who cares about what the Students and the Country needs, it's all about votes.

    Abolishing the fees wins votes

    Keeping the fees, saves money that can be used elsewhere to win votes

    Sensible solutions like funding specific subjects or places or means testing are neither here nor there and don't win votes.

    But sensible solutions would win more votes according to polls.

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    You guys are missing the point. Who cares about what the Students and the Country needs, it's all about votes.

    Abolishing the fees wins votes

    Keeping the fees, saves money that can be used elsewhere to win votes

    Sensible solutions like funding specific subjects or places or means testing are neither here nor there and don't win votes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X