- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Umbrella companies to be abolished
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Umbrella companies to be abolished"
Collapse
-
Umbrella's should be abolished as should one man Ltd. Instead introduce cash accounting, plenty simple.
-
I've bought 50 BTL properties, 1/4 Tonne of gold, 2000 BitCoins and shares in every company on planet. I think I made the most of it.Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostWe are at the end of the current economic cycle, we have massive debt, and brexit is about to begin. All parties will have to tighten spending and raise taxes. You've never had it so good. Hope you made the most out of it while the sun was shining.
Leave a comment:
-
Bollocks The only principle to come out of the pseudo science of economics with any real world data to back it up is the Laffer curve; I would disrespectfully suggest that if taxes go higher their is a high probability that tax take will reduce (companies move elsewhere, people reduce their economic effort, etc); with a debt of 1.7 trillion (a mind boggling large sum) tinkering with taxes in attempt to increase revenue will not even clear the deficit by the end of the next Parliament. The next Government needs to spend less (cancel HS2, cull the Quangos) and go for growth (reduce taxes to encourage business).Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostWe are at the end of the current economic cycle, we have massive debt, and brexit is about to begin. All parties will have to tighten spending and raise taxes...
Leave a comment:
-
We'll have to do exactly that at some point and probably in the next few years.Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostCitizens Income will solve all that.
Just got to tax the robots and computers to pay for it all.
If corporations own both the capital and the means of production, then no-one gets paid and no-one can afford the goods/services that the corporation produces.
Leave a comment:
-
Citizens Income will solve all that.
Just got to tax the robots and computers to pay for it all.
Leave a comment:
-
The people seem to want National Socialism and that is what they are going to get.Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostYou saying the government are using auto enrolment workplace pensions as a form of NIC increase to their coffers, and anyone contributing to such a pension scheme should not be surprised to find the coffer jar empty when we later want to put our hand in it?
I accept there are no real distinct parties anymore. May as well have an 'all of the above' on the voting slip and let us pick and choose the manifesto promises we would like them to at least attempt to follow up on. Majority rule on the chosen ones. Someday they'll computerise it all so this is how a new government is formed.
It's a perfectly rational economic system for the short term, the fact that a far right party in Germany used it in the 30s (and got named after it) is neither here nor there.
The problem is that National Socialism is inherently protectionist and a cursory understanding of economic history indicates that protectionist systems only work in the short term.
Leave a comment:
-
You know before the Brexit stuff they were suppose to increase the state pension age if you were under 48?Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostCrumbs.
And if not even those are left, what will all those trusting their state/workplace pensions are safe live off when the time comes?
I think the more likely outcome is they'll continue to increase the national debt for decades to come until there's an incident that reduces the dependant population one way or another, such as a dodgy batch of flu jabs killing off all the OAPs.
Well due to Brexit they will ignore it for a while then when the people who are now 48 are 54 will suddenly go "Oh tulip we need to increase the pension age by 2 years" and then bring it in immediately.
Leave a comment:
-
Crumbs.
And if not even those are left, what will all those trusting their state/workplace pensions are safe live off when the time comes?
I think the more likely outcome is they'll continue to increase the national debt for decades to come until there's an incident that reduces the dependant population one way or another, such as a dodgy batch of flu jabs killing off all the OAPs.
Leave a comment:
-
Yup.Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostYou saying the government are using auto enrolment workplace pensions as a form of NIC increase to their coffers, and anyone contributing to such a pension scheme should not be surprised to find the coffer jar empty when we later want to put our hand in it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostThere is no Tory party anymore.
I don't know if May abolishes umbrellas, but I certainly would not be surprised - let's not forget about new NICs sneaked in under the guise of "auto-enrollment", this tulip works best if people are employees working directly for company: it's very important for "Tories" that this pension scam goes through as smoothly as possible.
You saying the government are using auto enrolment workplace pensions as a form of NIC increase to their coffers, and anyone contributing to such a pension scheme should not be surprised to find the coffer jar empty when we later want to put our hand in it?
I accept there are no real distinct parties anymore. May as well have an 'all of the above' on the voting slip and let us pick and choose the manifesto promises we would like them to at least attempt to follow up on. Majority rule on the chosen ones. Someday they'll computerise it all so this is how a new government is formed.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


Leave a comment: