• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: WTO rules

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "WTO rules"

Collapse

  • motoukenin
    replied
    Originally posted by chopper View Post
    Using Croatia's accession to the EU as an example, this was sorted in 2014 but ratification by all member states is still not yet complete. As a result, Croatia has transitional arrangements to access the EU's single markets without being an official member as yet.

    One poxy little region of Belgium nearly derailed CETA (one can argue whether CETA is a good thing or not).

    But is "The EU is so tulip at getting things done, it is better to be in it?" really an argument?
    Think it was Tusk who said they wanted 6 months for ratification that's why he said we only had 18 months, but I think your arguments do support a WTO environment for the UK. I am not a big fan of the EU but to me its like tax, nobody wants it everyone moans about it but if nobody paid it then we would not be in a good position.

    So I see leaving the EU as a short term pain that could cause massive problems for the UK if we don't handle it right even longer maybe, as I speak more than one language I am not as affected as most.

    Leave a comment:


  • chopper
    replied
    Originally posted by motoukenin View Post
    More likely we will get to that point in 2018 and all has to be wrapped up by Sept 2018 as that will allow until March 2019 to ratify, we could extend this but all 27 countries need to agree, which is very unlikely.
    Using Croatia's accession to the EU as an example, this was sorted in 2014 but ratification by all member states is still not yet complete. As a result, Croatia has transitional arrangements to access the EU's single markets without being an official member as yet.

    One poxy little region of Belgium nearly derailed CETA (one can argue whether CETA is a good thing or not).

    But is "The EU is so tulip at getting things done, it is better to be in it?" really an argument?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by motoukenin View Post
    WTO rules in terms of tarrifs may not be an issue as the weak pound will make our goods much cheaper to sell abroad, and WTO rules will make anything that the EU sell to us more expensive, so agree not as bad as some predict, where it will hurt us is when the paperwork is not done correctly and we are back to lorries piling up in Dover again.
    What goods are those? Where do the raw materials for those goods come from? Who is going to pick the fruit for all the jam to be made for export?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    They are limp home mode. They keep the wheels turning, but not designed for speed and efficiency.
    They are perfectly designed for speed though

    Leave a comment:


  • motoukenin
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Does anyone know which developed countries rely solely on WTO rules?
    WTO rules in terms of tarrifs may not be an issue as the weak pound will make our goods much cheaper to sell abroad, and WTO rules will make anything that the EU sell to us more expensive, so agree not as bad as some predict, where it will hurt us is when the paperwork is not done correctly and we are back to lorries piling up in Dover again.

    To get a trade deal we will need all 27 countries to agree, we have French and German elections this year and then we will need to agree the divorce deal (money we owe them) before trade negotiations start.

    More likely we will get to that point in 2018 and all has to be wrapped up by Sept 2018 as that will allow until March 2019 to ratify, we could extend this but all 27 countries need to agree, which is very unlikely.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Maybe we can establish a route across Asia to trade silk and horses with the Han Dynasty.
    Pretty sure the silk road was turned into a toll motorway years ago?

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    set up mutually beneficial trade routes with those countries which want to
    Maybe we can establish a route across Asia to trade silk and horses with the Han Dynasty.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    But Boris said WTO rules would be perfectly OK.
    They are limp home mode. They keep the wheels turning, but not designed for speed and efficiency.

    We need to go through a re-birth on the world stage. WTO will give us a framework to build on - if we need it.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    lets do something really scary

    set up mutually beneficial trade routes with those countries which want to

    and those which seek to impose large tariffs which make trade impossible we can forget.....

    unless 'someone' steps in a starts trying to stop us doing that....

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    But Boris said WTO rules would be perfectly OK.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by chopper View Post
    Brexit: WTO rules | Resources | Brexit | News & Publications | Travers Smith

    There is a section in there:

    "Do other countries rely solely on WTO rules?"

    "Very few countries rely solely on WTO rules in relation to their trade with the rest of the world."

    But doesn't actually list them.
    Perhaps emerging new nations such as South Sudan?

    Leave a comment:


  • chopper
    replied
    Brexit: WTO rules | Resources | Brexit | News & Publications | Travers Smith

    There is a section in there:

    "Do other countries rely solely on WTO rules?"

    "Very few countries rely solely on WTO rules in relation to their trade with the rest of the world."

    But doesn't actually list them.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Very few if any. They are the default starting point from which more sophisticated arrangements can be made.

    What the UK is doing is pretty unprecedented.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Principality of Sealand

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    started a topic WTO rules

    WTO rules

    Does anyone know which developed countries rely solely on WTO rules?

Working...
X