What if the home I am buying will be my main residence?
'Main residence' refers to the home you live in, not just a property you own. And which home is your main residence will be judged as a matter of 'fact' (for example, where you spend most nights, where the rest of your family lives, where you are registered to vote and where you are signed up to local doctors and dentists). You won't be able to 'elect' a main residence as you can for the purposes of Capital Gains Tax.
If the home you are buying replaces your main residence, you will not be liable for the 3% surcharge, even if you own an additional property/properties (such as a second home, or let flat) at the same time. This example is straight from the Government's consultation document:
"A owns both a main residence and a second home. She sells her main residence and purchases a new one. Although she has two properties at the end of the day of the transaction, she has replaced her main residence so the higher rates will not apply."
But replacing your main residence means the last one (or at least a 'major interest' in it) will need to be disposed of (eg, SOLD or GIFTED). If you are moving out of rented accommodation or, say, your parents' home this will NOT count as disposing of your main residence as you are not an owner or part-owner of that property.
Read more at Q&A: The 3% Stamp Duty surcharge on second homes - Zoopla
<**** OFF> Mordy + Atw </**** OFF>
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Question on stamp duty
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Question on stamp duty"
Collapse
-
It seems to catch a lot of people out. Both my estate agent and mortgage adviser (who is very good, not the type to make mistakes) warned me that since we own our old BTL property, we'd have to pay the 3% and reclaim it. One could argue it's needlessly complicated...
Leave a comment:
-
WHS!Originally posted by AtW View PostYes.
Actually , no let me check that as that seems ******* stupid, plus I applied for a mortgage in principle today forgetting all the other BTL houses I own.
Doogies post seems correct, but let me confirm.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, that's true - though in London a dog house would cost at least as muchOriginally posted by Mordac View PostAnyway, if your figures are correct it still won't apply unless OH has his eyes on something in the £2m+ bracket. Another reason to get expert advice, which I'm not sure is forthcoming on here.
Leave a comment:
-
Trust me to believe something in the Graun.Originally posted by AtW View Post" The main features of the proposed legislation will affect properties which are valued at more than £2 million and which are owned by “non-natural persons”. (This is a reference to foreign companies, partnerships, funds and the like, not to persons with strange personal habits.)
1. An annual charge of a minimum of £15,000 and a maximum of £140,000 depending on value. The new tax is called Annual Residential Property Tax (ARPT). "
How to escape the offshore property tax trap - Telegraph
At £20 mln the charge is particularly high.
Anyway, if your figures are correct it still won't apply unless OH has his eyes on something in the £2m+ bracket. Another reason to get expert advice, which I'm not sure is forthcoming on here.
Leave a comment:
-
" The main features of the proposed legislation will affect properties which are valued at more than £2 million and which are owned by “non-natural persons”. (This is a reference to foreign companies, partnerships, funds and the like, not to persons with strange personal habits.)Originally posted by Mordac View PostThat's on properties over £20m.
1. An annual charge of a minimum of £15,000 and a maximum of £140,000 depending on value. The new tax is called Annual Residential Property Tax (ARPT). "
How to escape the offshore property tax trap - Telegraph
At £20 mln the charge is particularly high.
Leave a comment:
-
That's on properties over £20m. And that's only if they choose to keep the individual owner(s) private. Around 200 chose to pay the tax (ATED) rather than declare who actually owns them.Originally posted by AtW View PostOffshore companies have to pay annual fees now, in some cases £210k per year!
More here: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...nership-secret
Leave a comment:
-
You need to speak to a specialist accountant. There are CGT implications, personal tax implications and SD implications. You need to factor in all your circumstances before you decide, but one factor could outweigh the others.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostBut technically, isn't that a change of ownership and thus itself subject to stamp duty?
Leave a comment:
-
If you move house, you do NOT pay the additional 3% on the new place provided you never own both the old and new residential houses at the same. If you do own both residential properties for some overlapped period, you must pay the additional 3% but then you get a refund later.

https://www.gov.uk/government/consul...#policy-design
Leave a comment:
-
Oh you mean a UK business, well yes, who in their right mind would setup a UK business to hold UK property?Originally posted by AtW View Post
Private Eye | Official Site - the UK's number one best-selling news and current affairs magazine, edited by Ian Hislop
Leave a comment:
-
Stamp duty does not apply to businesses.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostBut technically, isn't that a change of ownership and thus itself subject to stamp duty?
However, they are talking about making sellers pay stamp duty and not buyers, thus getting a double bite of all existing homes.
They are gonna bleed us dry.
Leave a comment:
-
Yup.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostBut technically, isn't that a change of ownership and thus itself subject to stamp duty?
Plus there is also an opinion that moving your BTL to a Limited company won't prevent that 3% duty:
"Can I avoid the surcharge by setting up a limited company?
A. The Government has a keen eye on preventing tax avoidance with this levy, so you won't be able to escape the surcharge by setting up a limited company for the purpose of buying a home or homes."
Q&A: The 3% Stamp Duty surcharge on second homes - Zoopla
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18

Leave a comment: