- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Good stuff for SF fans
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Good stuff for SF fans"
Collapse
-
Have to disagree there. I didn't want to see it again for that reason, then gave into temptation and bought the video of the first episode (which I'd never seen), really enjoyed it and ended up with the complete set. Okay, so you have to make some allowances for the time and general cheapness of it, but it's still much much better than the crap SciFi the BBC are currently making IMO.Originally posted by DaveBBlakes 7 was classic, unfortunately the memory is better than the reality. Watched them again a couple of years ago and they were dreadful.
Loved the original V mini series (have the DVDs), but I've tried to watch some of the TV series on SciFi again and not been able to get into it. But it is better than the Logan's Run TV series.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtWI am not sure to be honest - where would they find such good actors, IMO anyone else but original won't cut it.
I IMDBd most of them a couple of weeks ago, and it doesn't look like they're very busy
Leave a comment:
-
I am not sure to be honest - where would they find such good actors, IMO anyone else but original won't cut it.Originally posted by hattraThat would be worth seeing
Leave a comment:
-
That would be worth seeingOriginally posted by AtWYes V is tops - I think they are doing remake now.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtWYes V is tops - I think they are doing remake now.
I know, I cant wait
Leave a comment:
-
Has anyone been watching V on sky lately? I'm glued - I still love Marc Singer as much as I did when I was a kid, even if he is made entirely of cheese!
Leave a comment:
-
I nearly got to watch the series again on PBS over in the States, unfortunately I had to move fro San Francisco to Chicago after about three weeks and they weren't showing it there.
True, it looks quite dated, but Avon's humour withstood the test of time. A prime one to give the Battlestar "re-imagining" treatment to (but who would they get to replace Paul Darrow?).
Leave a comment:
-
Blakes 7 was classic, unfortunately the memory is better than the reality. Watched them again a couple of years ago and they were dreadful.
Leave a comment:
-
With the honourable exception of Seven of NineOriginally posted by DaveBNah, your thinking of Star Trek: Voyager there
Must agree with the Battlestar fans here - it's excellent. Never really got into B5, though the bits I've seen seemed pretty good.
.... and string vestsUFO.
Ladies with Purple Hair.
You know it makes sense.
Surely there's a fellow Blake's Seven fan out there?
Leave a comment:
-
Seen them. It's stonking.Originally posted by SallyAnneI've got the first 7 or so episodes of Season 3 downloaded - going to watch them tomorrow
I wont spoil it for you though,
I could never undestand the fuss about B5 myself. I thought it was a badly written, badly acted version of Star Trek.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtWNo it does not - new BG is good, but it lacks scale of the fight between Shadows and Vorlons, the scope of BG is way too limited - bloody fight for survival of an inferior species.
Leave a comment:
-
Right, in the car park now!Originally posted by AtWNo it does not - new BG is good, but it lacks scale of the fight between Shadows and Vorlons, the scope of BG is way too limited - bloody fight for survival of an inferior species.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FlubsterNooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!! Please, please, please don;t spoil it for the rest of us SF nerds....unless you can burn me off a couple of DVDs and send them to me.....
Yeah of course I will - send me your address.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: