Originally posted by chopper
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: So hard Brexit it is
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "So hard Brexit it is"
Collapse
-
That isn't what they meant. They are talking about the formal notification process and whether a vote is required in Parliament. It's pointless us arguing about that, because we aren't lawyers and there's a court case pending. However, in practice, it's moot, as I said, because a final vote will happen anyway. Basically, both the A50 and A127 cases have very little practical significance now w/r to the end state, but they may have an impact on timing (which I guess you could stretch to an impact on state, i.e. the continuity Bremoan delay strategy, but highly unlikely).
-
I don't think that's correct. To be in the EEA, you have to either be in the EU or in EFTA. We are not in EFTA and once we leave the EU, we will not be in that either. So we wouldn't be in the EEA.Originally posted by Eirikur View PostMay can trigger article 50, based on the mandate given by the referendum, but she has no mandate to trigger Article 127 of the European Economic Area agreement which sets out the mechanism for leaving the single market. so even after brexit we would still be in the EEA
(Personally, I think the 'Flexcit' approach preached by eureferendum.com - i.e. EFTA membership, so being in the EEA - is the way forwards. We voted to leave the political European Union, we didn't vote to leave the EEA, that we weren't asked about)
Leave a comment:
-
If there's a GE what's the bets it's a hung parliament and coalition government
in which case, all bets are off and it's remain
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
It's completely moot since May has announced that both houses of Parliament will get a vote on the final deal. Either the deal will be approved, together with any formal processes, or it won't be approved. If it isn't approved, there will be a GE, and the GE will seek to resolve all outstanding questions (regardless of whether A50 has been determined to be reversible in the intervening period, whether A127 has meaning within an A50 process etc.). The only hope for continuity Bremain is a GE, but it's quite likely that the default position will be WTO, if this happens at the end of the A50 process, while that is being resolved (hence enormous pressure on both houses to vote in favour).Originally posted by Eirikur View PostMay can trigger article 50, based on the mandate given by the referendum, but she has no mandate to trigger Article 127 of the European Economic Area agreement which sets out the mechanism for leaving the single market. so even after brexit we would still be in the EEA
Leave a comment:
-
May can trigger article 50, based on the mandate given by the referendum, but she has no mandate to trigger Article 127 of the European Economic Area agreement which sets out the mechanism for leaving the single market. so even after brexit we would still be in the EEA
Leave a comment:
-
Did I say that, or would I need to have said that to add any validity to your ridiculously gloomy speculative guessing?Originally posted by sasguru View PostSo you think Brexit will be a good thing for this country?

Why choose an arbitrary figure of only 2 years? It may take longer to quantify the long term ramifications. I am prepared to play the long game.Originally posted by sasguru View PostLets resurrect this thread 2 years from now, you cretinous imbecile.
You ought to try it sometime instead of constantly skipping about, desperately hoping for quick fixes all the time to appease your limited attention span.
Leave a comment:
-
they were in for a rough time regardless - hence voting for the not the status quo option in June....Originally posted by sasguru View PostHard to argue it won't have a negative impact.
Also hard to quantify that negative impact.
I think for experienced graduates with hard degrees down south, the impact will be minimal, since they are in short supply.
But the Brexiter demographic, particularly up North, are in for a very rough time.
Leave a comment:
-
So hard Brexit it is
Hard to argue it won't have a negative impact.
Also hard to quantify that negative impact.
I think for experienced graduates with hard degrees down south, the impact will be minimal, since they are in short supply.
But the Brexiter demographic, particularly up North, are in for a very rough time.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: