• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Unaffordable property prices"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Not true. Royalty visit Swindon regularly.
    I said WANTS

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Not true. Royalty visit Swindon regularly.
    More regularly than you think....

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Nobody wants to visit Swindon
    Not true. Royalty visit Swindon regularly.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Can still have the tourism, but they can visit some new council estates instead. Real Britain, not the fairy tale version.
    Nobody wants to visit Swindon

    Leave a comment:


  • SeededLoaf
    replied
    BoE should raise rates to 10% which will create a huge supply of property for sale.

    Plus I can then lease a 911 turbo from my savings interest

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Recurring tourism makes more money than one off confiscation of that land
    Can still have the tourism, but they can visit some new council estates instead. Real Britain, not the fairy tale version.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Recurring tourism makes more money than one off confiscation of that land

    Leave a comment:


  • Scruff
    replied
    Repossess Crown Land. The Monarchy is now no more than just a fantastic tourist attraction. Repossess the land owned by the Duke of Westminster. Repossess the Duchy of Cornwall - owned by an idiot.

    That might free up some capital to build homes for the less fortunate.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    we can stop that now. We don't have enough and if we want to get rid of them sell them to housing associations.

    Where else can you get subsidised accommodation for years and then buy it at a discount based on how many years the public have been paying for your existence? The 2 year rental means the rent can reflect real rates and tenants know they have 2 years to sort their life out before they are moved somewhere less attractive. Think of them as half way houses with training not cheap living.

    By all means offer council tenants help getting a mortgage to buy the house at full price but no discounts.
    Council housing is actually self funding.

    Most housing was built before 1980 which means any debt on buying the land and building them has long been paid off. All tenants do now is pay for their up keep.

    However because former governments did funny things with the receipts from the rents and sales, councils didn't have enough money to maintain them properly.

    In short whether it is council house rents, business rates, council tax or social care central government screws local councils.

    Oh and new tenants get temporary contracts before they get permanent ones, and there were plans to give tenants 5 year contracts. The reason for this term was to ensure security for under 18s in their schooling.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Then more people in council housing will just buy their properties decreasing supply even more...
    we can stop that now. We don't have enough and if we want to get rid of them sell them to housing associations.

    Where else can you get subsidised accommodation for years and then buy it at a discount based on how many years the public have been paying for your existence? The 2 year rental means the rent can reflect real rates and tenants know they have 2 years to sort their life out before they are moved somewhere less attractive. Think of them as half way houses with training not cheap living.

    By all means offer council tenants help getting a mortgage to buy the house at full price but no discounts.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Less demand is what we need not more supply.

    Build a wall on our borders and move work up north out of the south
    Right on.

    Build a big wall and have a big moat full of water!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Less demand is what we need not more supply.

    Build a wall on our borders and move work up north out of the south

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Local councils were banned for doing that by Thatcher.
    Great news. Thatcher is dead!!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    HMG should be compelled to ringfence the proceeds from council house sales for the construction of more council housing. Sorted.
    Local councils were banned for doing that by Thatcher.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Then more people in council housing will just buy their properties decreasing supply even more...
    HMG should be compelled to ringfence the proceeds from council house sales for the construction of more council housing. Sorted.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X