It gets even better
She's been signed off on the sick. Due to stress no doubt.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: She should have been locked up!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "She should have been locked up!"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by zeitghostProblem solved.
They've changed the judge...
They have also replaced her.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/staffordshire/6142520.stm
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JaredMErm we live in a soceity that preaches freedom of expression and freedom of speech.
We have people who do all sorts in this country. Just because wearing a veil has a religious connotation shouldn't make it any different.
If we let people wear what they want, believe in a right to express freely, then that extends to people who want to cover up as much as it extends to people who want to show more flesh or dress in questionable styles.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JaredMErm we live in a soceity that preaches freedom of expression and freedom of speech.
Leave a comment:
-
Erm we live in a soceity that preaches freedom of expression and freedom of speech.
We have people who do all sorts in this country. Just because wearing a veil has a religious connotation shouldn't make it any different.
If we let people wear what they want, believe in a right to express freely, then that extends to people who want to cover up as much as it extends to people who want to show more flesh or dress in questionable styles.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TrollFrom BBC:
Legal advisers and solicitors may wear the Islamic veil in court unless it interferes with the "interests of justice", judges have been told.
How many Muslim advocates have operated without a veil in the approx 800 years of the religion.
Are we going to get a spate of appeals on the grounds of an unfair trail 'exuse me M'lud I did n't get a fair trial - I could n't understand a word my lawyer said'
It is not a requirement of the Muslim religion - it is a requirement of a small fringe that has it's roots in Saudi Arabia.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by snawStop acting like a knob
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MailmanSorry, I should have used to technically correct name of ***!
Mailman
There's a line that seems easy for some people to cross when they hide behind the anonymity of a computer screen that in real life they wouldn't do, because in civilised society it's rightly considered offensive. Stop acting like a knob and cut out the offensive crap, it's not needed.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TrollI can just see all the criminals adopting this & standing in the dock wearing a veil...
Prosecution to the witness: "do you see the accused standing before you in this court"
err no
Would make police line-ups fun as well...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by snawCare to watch how you phrase things - calling people fuzzy wuzzies is overstepping the line big time, no matter how much you meant it in jest, or how valid your actual point may be.
Mailman
Leave a comment:
-
I can just see all the criminals adopting this & standing in the dock wearing a veil...
Prosecution to the witness: "do you see the accused standing before you in this court"
err no
Leave a comment:
-
Why can't we have freedom of what to wear ?? I don't wear a mask but I do like my batwoman mask !!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TrollI guess the BBC are going to be busy sanitising all those Dads Army episodes then
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: