Originally posted by IRMe
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Any other project managers sniggering at this?"
Collapse
-
I doubt it's the case, as like the article explains the Airlines will pay 56% of the cost of the compulsory purchases
-
As one of the Guardian commentators point out:
The Guardian's headline is extremely misleading, suggesting that Willie Walsh has only just found out about the plans.
The story itself says that he found out "when the Airport Commission report came out", which is the best part of 18 months ago.
Leave a comment:
-
When the decision about the third runway was announced a colleague mentioned that they purposely built their HQ at that point knowing full well it would need to be demolished if the runway was built. Now if you built with that in mind you could profit well from it. So what is the agenda behind this news release?
Leave a comment:
-
I think this is more about he was not personally notified rather than having no knowledge of it at all. I believe BA already knew the new runway would run through their HQ, but Willie was expecting a personal notification from the commission or whoever as a courtesy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GB9 View PostYou wonder about someone who runs an airline and who doesn't check where something large like a runway might go.
It will work well for them.
CPO or otherwise, the building will be purchased from them at a good value, they will be offered relocation costs, and then they will realise that T5 is too small for them, so will need to extend it, build T6 or rebuild T1.
Once that is done, Heathrow will need a 4th runway and the circle continues.
Leave a comment:
-
I worked in there once- it's not so much a building, more of a small town. BA will get over it...Originally posted by Sean Key View Posthttps://www.theguardian.com/travel/2...ll-raze-his-hq
BA boss shocked to find out that third Heathrow runway will raze his HQ
I've had to deliver bad news on a few projects in the past but....... he he he
Leave a comment:
-
You wonder about someone who runs an airline and who doesn't check where something large like a runway might go.Originally posted by Sean Key View Posthttps://www.theguardian.com/travel/2...ll-raze-his-hq
BA boss shocked to find out that third Heathrow runway will raze his HQ
I've had to deliver bad news on a few projects in the past but....... he he he
Leave a comment:
-
Any other project managers sniggering at this?
https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2...ll-raze-his-hq
BA boss shocked to find out that third Heathrow runway will raze his HQ
I've had to deliver bad news on a few projects in the past but....... he he heTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Today 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Yesterday 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11

Leave a comment: