Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: False self-employment
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "False self-employment"
Collapse
-
The unions are involved to create case law, so expect the losing side to appeal. Whether workers in those firms will join the unions after that is a different matter.
-
the companies are avoiding paying tax so I think HMRC should get involved. Glad the unions are involved but many of these companies require a union free workforce. Something should be done to save these desperate people.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostHMRC aren't the ones doing the court action it's the unions. It's in the union s interest (as well as ours) to ensure those on NMW aren't self-employed.
Leave a comment:
-
HMRC aren't the ones doing the court action it's the unions. It's in the union s interest (as well as ours) to ensure those on NMW aren't self-employed.
Leave a comment:
-
why can't HMRC & others pursue this kind of tulip instead of suing sick people in their lounges?
SCUMBAGS!!!
About time some pro bono lawyer or the government took a few companies to court.
Leave a comment:
-
False self-employment
Deliveroo, who use couriers on bikes to deliver restaurant food to homes and businesses, has changed the T&C on it's couriers so they earn less. As a result the couriers protested on Friday and as a result:
Linky and linkyThe Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy insisted that workers must be paid the “national living wage” (NLW) of £7.20 an hour unless a court or HM Revenue and Customs defines them as self-employed.
Delieveroo have also apparently have done this so unlike Uber, who are in court at the moment, they cannot be taken to court. However it's unenforceable.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: