Reply to: Attention ADMIN : As you've lost interest in keeping CUK Great

[LondonManc]

No plans to edit it. They aren't rules, more like suggestions.
If they were rules, based on this thread (and others) I'm also breaking number 1.

Stop talking to yourself then

Oh and NAT is living proof number 2 is ballhooks

[MarillionFan]

OK, no evidence, no victim, no crime, just cry babies whinging.


If these threads were created about other users, then we'd be handing out bans. As it is, we have to take the abuse from a few who are more interested in bullying others around to their way of thinking than they are in either supporting this site or being contractors.

Thanks for that input Johnny come lately. The problem with pointing out the mote in someone's eye is that you can't see the beam sticking out of your own.

[WTFH]

Which disproves rule 0 in your sig (until you edit your sig and make this post irrelevant )

No plans to edit it. They aren't rules, more like suggestions.
If they were rules, based on this thread (and others) I'm also breaking number 1.

[LondonManc]

OK, no evidence, no victim, no crime, just cry babies whinging.

Which disproves rule 0 in your sig (until you edit your sig and make this post irrelevant )

[WTFH]

HTHBIDI

OK, no evidence, no victim, no crime, just cry babies whinging.


If these threads were created about other users, then we'd be handing out bans. As it is, we have to take the abuse from a few who are more interested in bullying others around to their way of thinking than they are in either supporting this site or being contractors.

[shaunbhoy]

Provide examples, please.

If you need me to do that then my point is won.
Just remember, denial isn't just a river in Egypt.

[LondonManc]

Provide examples of things we've removed, please.

HTHBIDI

[WTFH]

but if you need to abuse mod powers to try and get your point across then your point of view is already fatally besmirched.

Provide examples, please.

[MrMarkyMark]

That's a stick. HTHBIDI

The moderators are consistent; they only moderate points of view that they disagree with. At least it's consistent though.

Totally agree, there is no impartiality or favouritism either, everyone gets treated in exactly the same way

[shaunbhoy]

That's a stick. HTHBIDI

The moderators are consistent; they only moderate points of view that they disagree with. At least it's consistent though.

If only they would stick to impartial moderation. If they want to get involved in the cut and thrust they should resign from moderation, but I doubt any of the serial offenders have the stones to do that. It seems to smack of low self esteem, but if you need to abuse mod powers to try and get your point across then your point of view is already fatally besmirched.

[LondonManc]

Well you did your bit by retiring sasguru, so that upped the quotient. But then you reappeared like a bad smell again and dragged it all back down again with your ill-researched gurning. Like a wonky boomerang!!

That's a stick. HTHBIDI

The moderators are consistent; they only moderate points of view that they disagree with. At least it's consistent though.

[Churchill]

It does feel like general, specifically, is so far in the cesspit that the snorkel has filled with tulip.

If the odour offends thy nostrils my dear, there's always the option to exit stage left.

[DimPrawn]

I blame Brexit...

Never heard of it? Isn't it banned by the EU?

[Scruff]

I'm a 'kin foreigner too. Patriotic one though...

[Churchill]

I blame Brexit...

'king foreigner!