• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Pointless voting now"

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by CretinWatcher View Post
    You've started early today
    Indeed.

    Leave a comment:


  • CretinWatcher
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Anyway, I think ill go and mug an old lady tonight, her fault for not having a robust defence against my criminal intent.
    You've started early today

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Anyway, I think ill go and mug an old lady tonight, her fault for not having a robust defence against my criminal intent.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    I have said that they are both to blame. I have not said the blame is apportioned.

    If a bank creates a system that allows employees to embezzle, is the bank blameless? No. Does the embezzler have mitigation? No.
    Both the system and the perpetrators are at fault.
    Do you have a dictionary handy? Can we look up apportioned?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    No, you have apportioned some level of blame on the system.

    The standard "she deserved it" defence.
    I have said that they are both to blame. I have not said the blame is apportioned.

    If a bank creates a system that allows employees to embezzle, is the bank blameless? No. Does the embezzler have mitigation? No.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    as the government only had a majority of 12 then Labour would be in charge and anything that has happened since the election should be null and void, including the referendum
    If the tories lost 13 seats they'd still have more than Labour. So they'd run a minority govt. or a coalition with the Oirish (and UKIPs one MP).

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    As I said.
    No, you have apportioned some level of blame on the system.

    The standard "she deserved it" defence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    The perpetrator is at fault.
    As I said.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    The postal voting system? Both the system and the perpetrators are at fault. It's not binary.
    The perpetrator is at fault.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    SO it is the system that is at fault, not the perpetrators?
    The postal voting system? Both the system and the perpetrators are at fault. It's not binary.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    The postal voting system is certainly more robust. I don't see that the system as a whole is any better or worse.
    SO it is the system that is at fault, not the perpetrators?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by CretinWatcher View Post
    Seems to me the Irish system is far more democratic than ours
    The postal voting system is certainly more robust. I don't see that the system as a whole is any better or worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by CretinWatcher View Post
    Seems to me the Irish system is far more democratic than ours
    It has been working out quite well for them recently I see.

    Leave a comment:


  • CretinWatcher
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Are we seriously offering up the Irish political system as a guide to how this country should conduct democracy?
    Seems to me the Irish system is far more democratic than ours

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    I am offering up the Irish system for entitlement to postal voting as a guide to how the UK should manage entitlement to postal voting.

    HTH
    Yes, I had noticed.

    "A whole-time member of the Defence Forces."

    10 pacifists and a rubber dinghy.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X