• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Finally some good news from Brexit!"

Collapse

  • CretinWatcher
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    Both are funded by the EU.

    IFS (well known to be lefties)


    NIESR


    Did the figures for the NHS include a reduction in the use of it's services by EU migrants?
    The shrinkage of the eocnomy will more than balance out, in a negative way, the use by EU migrants

    But you're missing the point as usual. I'm saying this is a good thing: if funding slows down because of Brexit it hastens the moment the NHS is replaced by a health service designed for the modern world.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    It's from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) and the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) .
    If you have some problem with their methodology do explain
    Both are funded by the EU.

    IFS (well known to be lefties)
    The proportion of funding the IFS gets from the EU has increased in recent years - from 5.9% of funding in 2009 to 11% in 2014.
    NIESR
    Instead, we carry out research commissioned from a variety of sources: government departments and agencies, the research councils, particularly the Economic and Social Research Council, the European Commission, charitable foundations, and the private sector.
    Did the figures for the NHS include a reduction in the use of it's services by EU migrants?

    Leave a comment:


  • CretinWatcher
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    However Brexit supporter Norman Steele said: “I’ve had lots of well-informed, reasonable debates with Project Fear’s brainwashed sheeple who hate their country.”
    We rest our case, m'lud.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post

    However Brexit supporter Norman Steele said: “I’ve had lots of well-informed, reasonable debates with Project Fear’s brainwashed sheeple who hate their country.”

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Time for a rest: UK exhausted from arguing with Brexit f**kwits

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    "We don't need no experts."
    An Ex is a has-been and a spurt is a drip......under pressure

    ....

    Oh the old ones are the best hey!

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    I am not convinced it is.

    All they were trying to say was that if we Brexit we can save on EU fees which could be put towards 'insert valid thing here'
    You won. You don't need to keep pretending that any of it made sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    That report is the usual left wing self interested tulipe as usual.

    Have you seen their previous reports?
    "We don't need no experts."

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    That is a cluster**** even for a Brexiter, innt ?!
    I am not convinced it is.

    All they were trying to say was that if we Brexit we can save on EU fees which could be put towards 'insert valid thing here'

    Leave a comment:


  • CretinWatcher
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    That report is the usual left wing self interested tulipe as usual.

    Have you seen their previous reports?
    It's from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) and the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) .
    If you have some problem with their methodology do explain
    Alternatively stick to La-la land where everything is going to be just fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    That report is the usual left wing self interested tulipe as usual.

    Have you seen their previous reports?

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Yes indeed it would I am sure many other public bodies in the UK could do with it too.

    Also note

    "Let's give" != "If we Brexit we are going to give"
    That is a cluster**** even for a Brexiter, innt ?!

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Yes indeed it would I am sure many other public bodies in the UK could do with it too.

    Also note

    "Let's give" != "If we Brexit we are going to give"

    Leave a comment:


  • CretinWatcher
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Yes but if we stayed in the EU there would still have been a deficit.
    Well 350 million a week would have helped, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • CretinWatcher
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post

    It's called "cognitive dissonance" when the evidence clashes with one's entrenched views.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X