Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Plenty of room in Scotland. Typically, the really windy places are not where people want to live which is handy apart from the logistics of hooking them to the grid.
Small modular nuclear plants, factory produced and buried in the ground outside towns and cities. Cheap. Safe. Whilst we get Fusion commercially viable by 2050.
The centre of the earth is already a nuclear power plant. Did a hole deep enough, only a 1-2km and you'll have useful steam pressure.
It only makes sense to put them over the sea, the wind is erratic over land.
Rather have a few modern gas fuelled power stations to be honest. The only pollution is some plant food.
Small modular nuclear plants, factory produced and buried in the ground outside towns and cities. Cheap. Safe. Whilst we get Fusion commercially viable by 2050.
Leave a comment: