- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Old Ground, New Take?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Old Ground, New Take?"
Collapse
-
Don't ditch a gig over opt in/out IMO. The chances of it mattering are pretty slim. It would dafter to start without a contract review than it worked getting your opt in/out wrong.
-
Cheers, much the answer I suspected. Also just realised that it sounds like I have signed the contract already - I haven't. I take it that the agency is not allowed to insist on the clause remaining in the contract if I want to opt in? Unfortunately the contract itself has multiple clauses along these lines and I am supposed to be starting in the next three days. Guess it's going to have to be a quick review by a lawyer to sort this out properly.
Leave a comment:
-
It would indicate you can't have a contract unless you are opted out. The fact you signed the contract with this in nigh mean you've also agreed to the opt out else you can't have the contract... Either way it's very complicated and messy so you should really sort it out. Calling yourself Inside because you didn't sign the opt out and thinking that trumps this is very grey at best. The idea of getting these things signed and agree to avoid ugly arguments later. Your approach is just creating a possibility for a fall out, not avoiding it.
Leave a comment:
-
Old Ground, New Take?
Hi All,
I was wondering if a clause such as,
'the Consultancy and the Consultancy Staff providing the Consultancy Services have agreed to opt out of the Conduct Regulations and have signed an agreement to that effect and as such understand that none of the Conduct Regulations apply to this Assignment. Further the Consultancy warrants that it will only supply staff to perform the Consultancy Services who have opted out of the Conduct Regulations and further that any person to whom the performance of the Consultancy Services are assigned or sub-contracted has opted out of the Conduct Regulations'
in a signed contract is rendered void by a ltd company contractor opting IN to the conduct regulations? No agreement, other than the contract itself was signed, so certainly no written (or verbal) confirmation of the OPT OUT status was provided to the agency.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Today 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: