- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Old Ground, New Take?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Old Ground, New Take?"
Collapse
-
Don't ditch a gig over opt in/out IMO. The chances of it mattering are pretty slim. It would dafter to start without a contract review than it worked getting your opt in/out wrong.
-
Cheers, much the answer I suspected. Also just realised that it sounds like I have signed the contract already - I haven't. I take it that the agency is not allowed to insist on the clause remaining in the contract if I want to opt in? Unfortunately the contract itself has multiple clauses along these lines and I am supposed to be starting in the next three days. Guess it's going to have to be a quick review by a lawyer to sort this out properly.
Leave a comment:
-
It would indicate you can't have a contract unless you are opted out. The fact you signed the contract with this in nigh mean you've also agreed to the opt out else you can't have the contract... Either way it's very complicated and messy so you should really sort it out. Calling yourself Inside because you didn't sign the opt out and thinking that trumps this is very grey at best. The idea of getting these things signed and agree to avoid ugly arguments later. Your approach is just creating a possibility for a fall out, not avoiding it.
Leave a comment:
-
Old Ground, New Take?
Hi All,
I was wondering if a clause such as,
'the Consultancy and the Consultancy Staff providing the Consultancy Services have agreed to opt out of the Conduct Regulations and have signed an agreement to that effect and as such understand that none of the Conduct Regulations apply to this Assignment. Further the Consultancy warrants that it will only supply staff to perform the Consultancy Services who have opted out of the Conduct Regulations and further that any person to whom the performance of the Consultancy Services are assigned or sub-contracted has opted out of the Conduct Regulations'
in a signed contract is rendered void by a ltd company contractor opting IN to the conduct regulations? No agreement, other than the contract itself was signed, so certainly no written (or verbal) confirmation of the OPT OUT status was provided to the agency.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Today 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37

Leave a comment: