• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Stephen Crabb announces there will be no further cuts to welfare"

Collapse

  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I'd vote for "Carrousel". For agents....

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You're just spouting rhetoric without logic. Less unemployed means less on benefits. Caps on welfare means less benefits. Local caps on how much housing benefit can be claimed means less benefits.

    Who is all this extra money going to? The welfare state has been in the hands of people who aren't 'wailing leftie liberals' for about 6 years now.
    That may be the logic but the reality is that welfare has continued to rise in line with growth

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I'd vote for "Carrousel". For agents....
    Yes, but Jenny Agutter should get to stay with us.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    These "silly" science fiction films are not looking so silly any more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan%27s_Run_(film)
    I'd vote for "Carrousel". For agents....

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    They remain pretty constant thanks to too many wailing leftie liberals wanting to pay people to do nothing in order to make themselves seem virtuous
    You're just spouting rhetoric without logic. Less unemployed means less on benefits. Caps on welfare means less benefits. Local caps on how much housing benefit can be claimed means less benefits.

    Who is all this extra money going to? The welfare state has been in the hands of people who aren't 'wailing leftie liberals' for about 6 years now.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    You've got to give them some praise for the way they've rallied round to make IDS look like a complete idiot.

    Everything in this budget will be scrapped in a few months anyway. Brexit vote gives them all the justification they need for really savage spending cuts.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Don't be silly, welfare costs are dropping like a stone as the Tories get everyone into well-paid, rewarding, aspirational jobs.

    In seriousness if unemployment is falling surely welfare costs must be dropping, as a share of GDP if not in absolute terms? Especially with welfare caps and other "stop taking the piss" measures.
    They remain pretty constant thanks to too many wailing leftie liberals wanting to pay people to do nothing in order to make themselves seem virtuous

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Presumably you would like anyone on welfare to be euthanized?
    These "silly" science fiction films are not looking so silly any more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan%27s_Run_(film)

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    but the rest is the usual bolloxs
    I'd disagree. That is a pretty good CV for an MP. At least he's done some work that is not only real-world, but actually worthy (apart form the "marketing consultant" bit).

    He's clearly worked very hard to get where he is. I'd never heard of him before, but I suspect he may be one to keep an eye on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    As a student, Crabb spent his summers working on building sites in different locations in England and Wales. For one job at a site on Newport Docks he reportedly lived in a tent during the week, returning to Pembrokeshire at weekends
    Have to have some respect for that

    but the rest is the usual bolloxs

    After his graduation, Crabb studied French through the Open University and gained an MBA at the London Business School.
    He began his career in the youth and charity sector with the National Council for Voluntary Youth Services while working part-time as a youth worker in inner city south London. From 1995 to 1996, Crabb was a Christian Action Research and Education parliamentary intern.

    In 1998, Crabb started work at the London Chamber of Commerce.[9] In the same year he was elected as the chairman of the Southwark North and Bermondsey Conservative Association, which position he held for two years. He was also an election monitor in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1998.In 2002 he became a marketing consultant

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Don't be silly, welfare costs are dropping like a stone as the Tories get everyone into well-paid, rewarding, aspirational jobs.

    In seriousness if unemployment is falling surely welfare costs must be dropping, as a share of GDP if not in absolute terms? Especially with welfare caps and other "stop taking the piss" measures.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Presumably the money to support the increasing welfare costs will come from one of your trees?
    Presumably you would like anyone on welfare to be euthanized?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Government announces there are no plans for further cuts to welfare

    Stephen Crabb, the new Welfare and Pensions Secretary, has suggested there will be no more welfare savings in this Parliament.

    He announced the government will not be going ahead with changes to PIP and that there will be no further plans to make welfare savings in this parliament.

    “We will not be going ahead with the changes to PIP that had been put forward,” he said

    “I am absolutely clear that a compassionate and fair welfare system should not just be about numbers.

    “Behind every statistic is a human being and perhaps sometimes in government we forget that.

    Source: Stephen Crabb announces there will be no further cuts to welfare - after David Cameron praises George Osborne and Iain Duncan Smith - Telegraph

    So, IDS took one for the team and protected countless people from savage Tory Scum (tm) cuts. What will they be cutting now?



    Health, Welfare and Edukation are ring fenced, so is the Defense. We can also be pretty certain that Debt Interest won't be cut either

    My calculation is that they'll need to cut 84 bln out of 181 bln remaining to get proficit IF the economy does not tank (which it will thanks to attack on investors who'd invest their money elsewhere).
    Presumably the money to support the increasing welfare costs will come from one of your trees?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The bizarre thing is that they're insisting they'll get MPs to vote on the Budget tomorrow, despite the fact that this affair has blown a £4.4 billion hole in the damn thing and Gideon hasn't got the faintest idea what to fill it with

    "Yeah, this finance bill is obviously now worthless and we can't tell you what we're actually going to do because we don't know, but just vote it through so we can pretend we're on top of things, there's a good chap."

    FFS
    There is a 84bn hole that needs filling.

    Things are pretty screwed. But not nearly as screwed as they were under Labour.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Government announces there are no plans for further cuts to welfare

    Stephen Crabb, the new Welfare and Pensions Secretary, has suggested there will be no more welfare savings in this Parliament.

    He announced the government will not be going ahead with changes to PIP and that there will be no further plans to make welfare savings in this parliament.

    “We will not be going ahead with the changes to PIP that had been put forward,” he said

    “I am absolutely clear that a compassionate and fair welfare system should not just be about numbers.

    “Behind every statistic is a human being and perhaps sometimes in government we forget that.

    Source: Stephen Crabb announces there will be no further cuts to welfare - after David Cameron praises George Osborne and Iain Duncan Smith - Telegraph

    So, IDS took one for the team and protected countless people from savage Tory Scum (tm) cuts. What will they be cutting now?



    Health, Welfare and Edukation are ring fenced, so is the Defense. We can also be pretty certain that Debt Interest won't be cut either

    My calculation is that they'll need to cut 84 bln out of 181 bln remaining to get proficit IF the economy does not tank (which it will thanks to attack on investors who'd invest their money elsewhere).
    That image is at least two years out of date though

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X