• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Paxman to be killed in Budget"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    its about time they gave a simple limited liability self employed option.

    Leave a comment:


  • ruasonid
    replied
    Those concerns may pale...

    OTS review: Seismic changes for small business | AccountingWEB

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    Originally posted by OnceStonedRose View Post
    What is your definition of "genuine freelancer"? What do you do different from the disguised permies?
    If you do contracts typically 3 or 6 months long, or as short as one day, spend a lot of time in Travelodges, work 3 hours from home, and have irregular "bench time", you are probably genuine freelance.

    If you work 6 miles from home, at the same desk you have occupied for 12 years, on a high daily rate, but technically not a member of staff, you are probably a disguised permy, and fairly likely to be working in the public sector.

    Leave a comment:


  • OnceStonedRose
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    In theory I welcome something that differentiates us (genuine freelancers) from disguided permies, as it stops us all being tarred with the same brush. And there are many of these disguises being worn in the public sector. Not by Paxo necessarily, but by regular staff lower down the chain.

    Theory and practice different though. In practice the measure is likely to grab a few headlines while keeping the real tax mega-evoiders happy, and making an example of a few little people.
    What is your definition of "genuine freelancer"? What do you do different from the disguised permies?

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    In theory I welcome something that differentiates us (genuine freelancers) from disguided permies, as it stops us all being tarred with the same brush. And there are many of these disguises being worn in the public sector. Not by Paxo necessarily, but by regular staff lower down the chain.

    Theory and practice different though. In practice the measure is likely to grab a few headlines while keeping the real tax mega-evoiders happy, and making an example of a few little people.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlipTheJab
    started a topic Paxman to be killed in Budget

    Paxman to be killed in Budget

    Gideon has green lighted this to ensure no tough post budget questioning, don't worry though he will be devoting a full hour to answer all our tax related questions on the One Show
Working...
X