Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Crackdown on PSCs in public sector"
How far do you think will Gideon might go with: "Confirm plans to cut income tax for middle class workers and the low paid by raising the tax free allowance, and the 40p higher rate threshold."?
Not far - he'll move increase to what was promised to happen in April 2020
"Confirm plans to cut income tax for middle class workers and the low paid by raising the tax free allowance, and the 40p higher rate threshold."?
The headlines are mixed and some are confusing the wider issue ("100,000 companies, 400m tax") with the public sector portion (20,000, 70m). This has obviously been briefed as focusing on the public sector, but it may be for the briefing or, more likely, they will phase it in, beginning with the public sector. Afterall, it's will be easier to enforce in the public sector. Based on the details in some articles, it still sounds more like as ESI approach than an outright ban.
Sounds quite similar to the idea mooted in the IR35 discussion document whereby the client (public sector employer) decides on status. If it's happening in the public sector now, it'll be in the private sector before long.
"An estimated 20,000 public sector workers reduce their income tax and national insurance bills by £3,500 each year"
Chasing 70 mln when the annual hole in budget is 70 bln.
Sounds quite similar to the idea mooted in the IR35 discussion document whereby the client (public sector employer) decides on status. If it's happening in the public sector now, it'll be in the private sector before long.
Interesting quote in the Mirror: "The reform means that workers will be given questionnaires by bosses to determine how they should be taxed." The headlines could, therefore, be misleading (e.g. revamped ESI vs. enforced on-payroll).
Leave a comment: