• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Sir Philip Green

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Sir Philip Green"

Collapse

  • saptastic
    replied


    Sir PG Yacht renamed.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Are you PGs "right hand man"?
    No, but I know that he is rich enough and smart enough to have good accountants/solicitors that made sure his big dividend payment was well above the board.

    It was simple really - when company did fantastically well lots of money were abound, so pension fund could not have had issues because the present was rosy and so was the future...

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Are you PGs "right hand man"?
    Are you suggesting something improper?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I am pretty sure it was fully funded AT THE TIME, dividends were taken a very long time ago when company did real well, so all was lovely dovely back then.
    Are you PGs "right hand man"?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    From an external perspective, BHS underfunded the pension obligations whilst PG took hefty dividends.
    Its all legal. But maybe not a great example from a Knight of the Realm. Of course the PG buys a new yacht is the Mail's way of turning it into a story with lots of crap pics.
    I am pretty sure it was fully funded AT THE TIME, dividends were taken a very long time ago when company did real well, so all was lovely dovely back then.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    Name Names.....
    Please don't, I get enough begging letters as it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • saptastic
    replied
    Originally posted by greenlake View Post
    Most of us here could easily buy a £100 yacht....

    There are only a couple of CUK members that could afford £100 million though.
    Name Names.....

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    That's not a yacht, that's a stinkpot.
    Yachts have sails, they glide through the water using wind as their main form of propulsion. They require skill to know how to get them to go the way you want them to, rather than just a heavy hand on the throttle.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    Phils new £100 Yacht
    Most of us here could easily buy a £100 yacht....

    There are only a couple of CUK members that could afford £100 million though.

    Leave a comment:


  • saptastic
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    He sold it some time ago, why should not he buy another yacht?

    He could have called in liquidators to "relief himself of the duty" anyway.
    From an external perspective, BHS underfunded the pension obligations whilst PG took hefty dividends.
    Its all legal. But maybe not a great example from a Knight of the Realm.

    Of course the PG buys a new yacht is the Mail's way of turning it into a story with lots of crap pics.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    He sold it some time ago, why should not he buy another yacht?

    He could have called in liquidators to "relief himself of the duty" anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • saptastic
    replied
    Phils new £100 Yacht

    Phillip Green buys third YACHT despite BHS failing to meet pension commitments | Daily Mail Online

    New Yacht for Sir Phil yet...

    "During his 15 years in control of BHS, Sir Philip took more than £400 million out of the firm via special dividends paid to his wife Tina, who lives in the tax haven of Monaco. Though perfectly legal, the tax-efficient payments meant that cash which might otherwise have been used to bolster the pension fund or, indeed, to invest more in the firm’s long-term future, was instead funnelled into the family coffers. By then offloading BHS, at a time when it was losing around £85 million a year, Sir Philip was able to relieve himself of the duty (or ‘covenant’) to fulfil commitments to future pensioners who belonged to the by now troubled scheme".

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Half a billion pension fund deficit there
    Just cancel all the pensions. Sorted.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    Philip Green knows BHS is sinking so finds four people who have no history in retail to buy it for a £1.
    His ego is too big to see it fail under his stewardship.
    Whether the new people have any serious intention to save it.....
    Half a billion pension fund deficit there

    Leave a comment:


  • saptastic
    replied
    Philip Green knows BHS is sinking so finds four people who have no history in retail to buy it for a £1.
    His ego is too big to see it fail under his stewardship.
    Whether the new people have any serious intention to save it.....

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X