We have all done gigs in places where its a madhouse. I raise things, suggest changes and propose rollout/process change to fix. However when they are clearly not interested i keep my gob shut smile and keep on invoicing.
Often through the clients own stupidity and halfwit permies i end up staying longer so i am no that bothered either way!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Leaving contract early
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Leaving contract early"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by billybiro View PostAs for your final point, don't flatter yourself. No matter how much of a smooth-talker you are or how much influence you can assert, you can't make someone do something and many clients simply won't budge from the above position, and life is far too short to waste your time on idiots that clearly don't really want to be helped.
If they don't listen quickly, then you would probably be right, there is nothing left to try and salvage.
You can lead a horse to water and all that.
As I said earlier, though, some of the most profitable ones for me, have been the biggest nightmares, in the first instance.
Maybe, I just like the pain
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostSurely the bigger man, mans up and fixes the situation.
However, I will say that this should only be followed if you, truly have the ability to nail the problem, once and for all.
Done it a number of times, listened to, "fixed" the issues, gained respect, given a 10% bump on day rate, turned a 3 month contract to 3.5 years, for me.
Repeat business assured.
Very profitable, I can assure you.
Interesting thing is, half of that part of the business did it my way, with associated builds and processes and the other half didn't.
You should see the sate of the other half, we were getting around 12 incidents a year, the other side ran into 50 -100 each month.
Final point is, if you have true expertise, knowledge and influence, in most cases you can turn it around, not all, but most.
Basically, raise the issue, but if the client isn't pulling out all the stops to help sort it out immediately, you can bet your bottom dollar it won't get sorted (satisfactorily) at all. So then you walk.
As for your final point, don't flatter yourself. No matter how much of a smooth-talker you are or how much influence you can assert, you can't make someone do something and many clients simply won't budge from the above position, and life is far too short to waste your time on idiots that clearly don't really want to be helped.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by billybiro View PostWTF?
The "manning up" thing to do here is to walk. Walk immediately. When the client hits you with a breach-of-contract lawsuit, you file a breach-of-contract counter-suit for the procedures etc. that haven't been followed (you do have them contractualised, don't you?)
Yes, we all know that you're burning bridges and all that, but look at it like this. You're burning bridges with an insane client that you don't ever want a bridge with in the first place, so nothing lost.
Or, you could do what LondonManc suggests, which is the exact opposite of "manning up" and is more akin to bending over and lubing up your own backside like some bedwetting doormat in indentured servitude.
However, I will say that this should only be followed if you, truly have the ability to nail the problem, once and for all.
Done it a number of times, listened to, "fixed" the issues, gained respect, given a 10% bump on day rate, turned a 3 month contract to 3.5 years, for me.
Repeat business assured.
Very profitable, I can assure you.
Interesting thing is, half of that part of the business did it my way, with associated builds and processes and the other half didn't.
You should see the sate of the other half, we were getting around 12 incidents a year, the other side ran into 50 -100 each month.
Final point is, if you have true expertise, knowledge and influence, in most cases you can turn it around, not all, but most.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostNonsense. If there was an agreed process in work and someone didn't follow it, you'd walk? That's not manning up, that's dummy spitting and cutting off your nose to spite your face.
If you're working on a project and process isn't being followed, which is jeopardising delivery, do you walk off site or do you raise it? You must have manned up and walked off site a few times.
Yeah I can't see walking over that. Raise the issue with anyone who will listen; if no one will listen do what you can do and don't renew at the end. It's only work, try not to take it so seriously.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by billybiro View PostWTF?
The "manning up" thing to do here is to walk. Walk immediately. When the client hits you with a breach-of-contract lawsuit, you file a breach-of-contract counter-suit for the procedures etc. that haven't been followed (you do have them contractualised, don't you?)
Yes, we all know that you're burning bridges and all that, but look at it like this. You're burning bridges with an insane client that you don't ever want a bridge with in the first place, so nothing lost.
Or, you could do what LondonManc suggests, which is the exact opposite of "manning up" and is more akin to bending over and lubing up your own backside like some bedwetting doormat in indentured servitude.
If you're working on a project and process isn't being followed, which is jeopardising delivery, do you walk off site or do you raise it? You must have manned up and walked off site a few times.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by billybiro View PostThe "manning up" thing to do here is to walk. Walk immediately. When the client hits you with a breach-of-contract lawsuit, you file a breach-of-contract counter-suit for the procedures etc. that haven't been followed (you do have them contractualised, don't you?)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostMan up and raise any deviations from the agreed path.
If you have a risk register/issue log/RAID log, use them.
The "manning up" thing to do here is to walk. Walk immediately. When the client hits you with a breach-of-contract lawsuit, you file a breach-of-contract counter-suit for the procedures etc. that haven't been followed (you do have them contractualised, don't you?)
Yes, we all know that you're burning bridges and all that, but look at it like this. You're burning bridges with an insane client that you don't ever want a bridge with in the first place, so nothing lost.
Or, you could do what LondonManc suggests, which is the exact opposite of "manning up" and is more akin to bending over and lubing up your own backside like some bedwetting doormat in indentured servitude.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wilmslow View PostMaybe I just need a day off and a reboot. Or a pot noodle.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wilmslow View PostHas anyone actually done it? Often talked about here. I am giving it consideration. My notice period is 28 days, their notice is 7 days – which complicates matters somewhat.
Politics are too rampant, I am working with some disturbed people, eg this mornings rant from a colleague about the whiteboard. I am needing to worry more about my sanity than the day rate. Scott Adams would have a field day here.
I have a quality process that was agreed, but the said process has been ignored, resulting in non-achievance of what were already challenging dates, and a rack of problems that should have been managed early getting ignored and problems compounded. I have an excellent relationship with the business and user community, but having serious challenges with a poisonous programme manager who just wants me to accept all his problems without listening.
Need to decide if I can be bothered to deal with matters or to just walk. Which will be a slow walk at 28 days.....
Maybe I just need a day off and a reboot. Or a pot noodle.
If you have a risk register/issue log/RAID log, use them.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return mistakes contractors will make any day now… Yesterday 09:27
- Experts you can trust to deliver UK and global solutions tailored to your needs! Jan 8 15:10
- Business & Personal Protection for Contractors Jan 8 13:58
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Jan 8 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Jan 7 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
Leave a comment: