• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "HMS Queen Elizabeth, the UK's newest Aircraft Carrier"

Collapse

  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post
    Using windoz will be the least of the QE's (and PoW's) worries.

    The USN Carrier Groups normally sail with 1 air defence guided missle cruiser ( the RN has no cruisers so a Type 45 destroyer will have to do!), upto 2 anti submarine frigates or destroyers (the RN's frigates are reaching end of life so again, a Type 45 destroyer will have to do. This will likely be the same T45 assigned to the group instead of a cruiser!), 2 other air defence \ anti submarine capable ships. There will also be a couple of replenishment ships. (Not sure how many RFA's capable of replenishing the QE or PoW at sea are currently in service but let's be generous and say there's at least 1!)

    Again the RN only has 6 Type 45 destroyers in service so that will also probably be the same T45 used in place of the cruiser and anti submarine frigates!





    So, the QE or PoW if it ever sees service will be protected by 1 Type 45 destroyer and be the biggest sitting duck on the high seas! Think on.
    It's all moot anyway since she won't have any aircraft until 2023.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Quite amazing. The UK produces this magnificent piece of engineering and all you lot can do is babble on about which windows f**king operating system is being used
    A system is only as strong as it's weakest link

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    By the looks of it, you have had a share in the pie supplying contractors for this project
    Exactly, his mind is all commission based..
    I bet he made a mint supplying Windows 3x. guys, which us tax payers then had to pay for

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post
    Using windoz will be the least of the QE's (and PoW's) worries.

    The USN Carrier Groups normally sail with 1 air defence guided missle cruiser ( the RN has no cruisers so a Type 45 destroyer will have to do!), upto 2 anti submarine frigates or destroyers (the RN's frigates are reaching end of life so again, a Type 45 destroyer will have to do. This will likely be the same T45 assigned to the group instead of a cruiser!), 2 other air defence \ anti submarine capable ships. There will also be a couple of replenishment ships. (Not sure how many RFA's capable of replenishing the QE or PoW at sea are currently in service but let's be generous and say there's at least 1!)

    Again the RN only has 6 Type 45 destroyers in service so that will also probably be the same T45 used in place of the cruiser and anti submarine frigates!



    So, the QE or PoW if it ever sees service will be protected by 1 Type 45 destroyer and be the biggest sitting duck on the high seas! Think on.
    The lead ship of the T26 class "should" be in active service by the time QE launches

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Defence firms are a firm believer of "if it ain't broke don't fix it"

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Using windoz will be the least of the QE's (and PoW's) worries.

    The USN Carrier Groups normally sail with 1 air defence guided missle cruiser ( the RN has no cruisers so a Type 45 destroyer will have to do!), upto 2 anti submarine frigates or destroyers (the RN's frigates are reaching end of life so again, a Type 45 destroyer will have to do. This will likely be the same T45 assigned to the group instead of a cruiser!), 2 other air defence \ anti submarine capable ships. There will also be a couple of replenishment ships. (Not sure how many RFA's capable of replenishing the QE or PoW at sea are currently in service but let's be generous and say there's at least 1!)

    Again the RN only has 6 Type 45 destroyers in service so that will also probably be the same T45 used in place of the cruiser and anti submarine frigates!



    So, the QE or PoW if it ever sees service will be protected by 1 Type 45 destroyer and be the biggest sitting duck on the high seas! Think on.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    3.1 's probably a scarce skill, I wonder what their contractors get paid
    I had a client about 6 years ago that still used 4 or 5 16 bit Windows applications as part of their software suite (that they sold to their clients). It wasn't the main part of the job but the fact I was old enough to have done Windows 3.1 software and could maintain it was a selling point.

    I probably could still do it. I don't think there's much demand.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Are you sure you want to launch the F22?

    I'm sorry, launch of the F22 is not available at this time.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    The US Navy still uses Windows XP too....

    The U.S. Navy is paying Microsoft millions of dollars to keep up to 100,000 computers afloat because it has yet to transition away from Windows XP.

    The Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, which runs the Navy's communications and information networks, signed a $9.1 million contract earlier this month for continued access to security patches for Windows XP, Office 2003, Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003.

    The entire contract could be worth up to $30.8 million and extend into 2017.
    US Navy paid millions to stay on Windows XP | Computerworld

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Indeed.

    Just remember Nott the Defence Secretary and his plans to decimate the Navy around about the time it became rather necessary.

    Yet another brilliant Tory plan that, thankfully, wasn't implemented.

    This current lot are equally dense.
    It's good PR to say we have to save money but it's bad PR to say you are a pacifist.

    Something a certain party leader should learn.....

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Quite amazing. The UK produces this magnificent piece of engineering and all you lot can do is babble on about which windows f**king operating system is being used
    Probably because it was the Labour Party who initiated the building of it

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    By the looks of it, you have had a share in the pie supplying contractors for this project
    if only

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Quite amazing. The UK produces this magnificent piece of engineering and all you lot can do is babble on about which windows f**king operating system is being used
    That can be sunk by a few rocket-carrying drones in today's warfare world...

    Two Minutes Hate, anyone?

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Quite amazing. The UK produces this magnificent piece of engineering and all you lot can do is babble on about which windows f**king operating system is being used
    By the looks of it, you have had a share in the pie supplying contractors for this project

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X