- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: That'll learn her
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "That'll learn her"
Collapse
-
So transexuals should get a stiff sentence (fnar fnar) for blackmail if tits is the only requirementOriginally posted by NibblyPig View Postsuspended sentence
for ****s sake you can get away with anything if you have tits!
The sentencing guidelines say up to 14 years for blackmail. Look at their case studies!
R v Telford [1992] 13 Cr. App. R. (S) 676
Pleaded guilty to blackmail. The defendant wrote to sweet manufactures and threatened to contaminate there products unless they paid him £1m. 8 years.
R v Darling [1994] 15 Cr. App. R. (S) 855
Pleaded guilty to blackmail. The appellant wrote to a hotel, threatening to carry out attacks on guests and staff of the hotel and to publicise the connection with the hotel, unless he was paid £120,000. 5 years.
R v Hoey and Sherwood [1992] 13 Cr. App. R. (S) 177
Convicted of blackmail. The defendants were concerned in attempting to persuade the staff of a public house to pay protection money, under threats to damage the premises. Amateurish protection racket. 3 years.
Leave a comment:
-
Dude, don't forget she also gotOriginally posted by LucidDementia View PostShe should get 5 years for a fake rape claim straight off the bat.
80 hours community service work.
Some friend, almost sounds like an agent, wonder what their cut was.same mutual friend acted as a go-between, communicating Mendis would drop the case for £200,000.
Leave a comment:
-
She should get 5 years for a fake rape claim straight off the bat.
Leave a comment:
-
suspended sentence
for ****s sake you can get away with anything if you have tits!
The sentencing guidelines say up to 14 years for blackmail. Look at their case studies!
R v Telford [1992] 13 Cr. App. R. (S) 676
Pleaded guilty to blackmail. The defendant wrote to sweet manufactures and threatened to contaminate there products unless they paid him £1m. 8 years.
R v Darling [1994] 15 Cr. App. R. (S) 855
Pleaded guilty to blackmail. The appellant wrote to a hotel, threatening to carry out attacks on guests and staff of the hotel and to publicise the connection with the hotel, unless he was paid £120,000. 5 years.
R v Hoey and Sherwood [1992] 13 Cr. App. R. (S) 177
Convicted of blackmail. The defendants were concerned in attempting to persuade the staff of a public house to pay protection money, under threats to damage the premises. Amateurish protection racket. 3 years.
Leave a comment:
-
That'll learn her
Dilrushi Mendis blackmailed her former boss Nihal Seneviratne after affair | Daily Mail Online
Scorned secretary blackmailed her former boss after they had an affair by demanding £200,000 to drop false rape claim she made against him
Dilrushi Mendis claimed she was raped by businessman Nihal Seneviratne
40-year-old blackmailed ex-boss after he ended their affair and sacked her
She demanded £200,000 from him in return for dropping false rape claims
Mother-of-one handed a suspended prison sentence for blackmail chargeTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Autumn Budget 2026: 10 predictions for UK contractors Today 00:08
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Yesterday 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12



Leave a comment: