Reply to: ****** of the day ...

[LucidDementia]

Nah he'd just bend over. Same way he does now in fact.

[fullyautomatix]

and where is the justice for lee Rigby?

that fu<k is clearly guilty of first degree murder and should be hung - when there is absolutely no ambiguity over the crime the death penalty should be an option.

The law has run its course on that one. He has been jailed.

We are talking rights of the prisoners here.

Imagine for some reason you got jailed and were denied opportunity for proper justice, you would jumping up and down shouting for prisoners rights etc etc.

[FatLazyContractor]

How does hanging him help his victim?

Saves taxpayers money. Do you pay tax?

[d000hg]

and where is the justice for lee Rigby?

that fu<k is clearly guilty of first degree murder and should be hung - when there is absolutely no ambiguity over the crime the death penalty should be an option.

How does hanging him help his victim?

[LucidDementia]

I just resent paying for him to be in the clink, we could have prison factories for his sort to make them pay there way in society to offset the costs of their jihad

I think Hard Labour should be put in place. As for the death-penalty; it's a self-defeating argument.

[BrilloPad]

That kind of thinking would have meant little to the Paddy's who were fitted up for IRA offences by the old bill. The fact that he is never getting out of the clink not enough for you?

Indeed. Death is an easy way out. He will get a hard time inside - rightly or wrongly.

[MicrosoftBob]

That kind of thinking would have meant little to the Paddy's who were fitted up for IRA offences by the old bill. The fact that he is never getting out of the clink not enough for you?

I just resent paying for him to be in the clink, we could have prison factories for his sort to make them pay there way in society to offset the costs of their jihad

[SlipTheJab]

and where is the justice for lee Rigby?

that fu<k is clearly guilty of first degree murder and should be hung - when there is absolutely no ambiguity over the crime the death penalty should be an option.

That kind of thinking would have meant little to the Paddy's who were fitted up for IRA offences by the old bill. The fact that he is never getting out of the clink not enough for you?

[BrilloPad]

and where is the justice for lee Rigby?

that fu<k is clearly guilty of first degree murder and should be hung - when there is absolutely no ambiguity over the crime the death penalty should be an option.

And you assume there will be no recriminations for that?

If you were in charge the Ireland troubles would still be going on. At some point you have to draw a line.

I might add, with my brother as a former soldier, that you join the army to die.

[original PM]

We should be grateful that we are living in a society where justice is available to everybody in equal measure. A lot of people in this world would love to have that.

and where is the justice for lee Rigby?

that fu<k is clearly guilty of first degree murder and should be hung - when there is absolutely no ambiguity over the crime the death penalty should be an option.

[d000hg]

We should be grateful that we are living in a society where justice is available to everybody in equal measure. A lot of people in this world would love to have that.

I love your trolling.

[fullyautomatix]

We should be grateful that we are living in a society where justice is available to everybody in equal measure. A lot of people in this world would love to have that.

[MicrosoftBob]

Why? Lots of blatantly guilty scumbag murderers need lawyers.

Presumably except Tony Bliar, as he's already married to one

[barrydidit]

I did smile to myself when I heard that the original investigation had concluded that the prison officers in question used only approved restraint techniques and they had no case to answer.

He's pissing in the wind though, no judge would rule in his favour and I bet he knows that. He'll also know he can waste a load of the Crusaders tax money and grab publicity with endless appeals. The tw@

[d000hg]

Surely whoever has to represent his case would be committing professional suicide?

Not necessarily. It's an important part of our justice system that even the offenders are treated properly. If for instance guards play favourites or allow "bad" criminals to be attacked vigilante-style, then that should be looked into.

(I didn't read the story for details so that's just hypothetical)