• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Daddy's Roommate

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Daddy's Roommate"

Collapse

  • snaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Dundeegeorge
    Not like the BBC, who don't actually seem to have anything about it on their site, although it's all over the net in various blogs. Of course, the BBC have no agenda but the bloggers do, silly me.
    I think the conspiracy ranges much wider than the BBC - virtually no major news organisation is reporting it (BBC did though). Proof conclusive that the media is indeed fully in control of the terrorist loving lefties, and muslims.

    Either that or no one actually gives a toss. Unless of course your agenda is satiisfied by highlighting this kind of minor crap out.

    Is it still even happening - can't find sh!t doing a google news search for last 2 weeks - what kind of blogs you visiting where it's all people are talking about. Let me guess ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Rantor
    replied
    Originally posted by Dundeegeorge
    Not like the BBC, who don't actually seem to have anything about it on their site, although it's all over the net in various blogs. Of course, the BBC have no agenda but the bloggers do, silly me.
    I have just asked six Belgians of both language groups and three of them struggled to remember what I was talking about so it doesn't seem to have much impact in undermining western culture and paving the way for a pan-european islamicist superstate.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    More organised than our lot.

    They pop home for a nice bit of dinner first, can't riot on an empty stomach can you?

    What should be noticed about the riots is that they start after sunset. Besides the fact that they start after dark, it also gives the rioters enough time to break their fast and enjoy the traditional family meal. Sunset is around 7:30pm.” Tuesday’s and Monday’s riots began around 8:30pm.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dundeegeorge
    replied
    Indeed I think it's obvious he has an agenda

    Originally posted by Rantor
    Nice spin and a wee bit more hysterical than most of the local press coverage. I walked through the Marolles every day between these establishment-toppling events and it looked like knob-all.

    Paul B who runs that site is up to his neck in extreme right VB stuff (married to one of their MPs or MEPs) and way on the far edge of flemish nationalism. He does provide good copy to those that already see things in a certain light but I always thinkthese guys 'libertarian' credentials have a few contradictions lurking in there.
    Not like the BBC, who don't actually seem to have anything about it on their site, although it's all over the net in various blogs. Of course, the BBC have no agenda but the bloggers do, silly me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rantor
    replied
    Originally posted by Dundeegeorge
    Nice spin and a wee bit more hysterical than most of the local press coverage. I walked through the Marolles every day between these establishment-toppling events and it looked like knob-all.

    Paul B who runs that site is up to his neck in extreme right VB stuff (married to one of their MPs or MEPs) and way on the far edge of flemish nationalism. He does provide good copy to those that already see things in a certain light but I always thinkthese guys 'libertarian' credentials have a few contradictions lurking in there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dundeegeorge
    replied
    Oh, sorry, my mistake

    Originally posted by Rantor
    Brussels, riots, when???

    Some young ruffians torched some cars and a cafe a few weeks ago after some bloke died in custody but it was all a bit half-hearted really. Went on for a few nights, most of them got nicked, no-one really noticed.

    Just high spirits I guess
    http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1384

    Leave a comment:


  • Rantor
    replied
    Originally posted by Dundeegeorge
    in order that islam can flood in and become the european religion.
    You are aware I take it of the riots throughout Brussells during Ramadan, and lesser ones in Paris, although there's an ongoing war with 'disaffected muslim youth' (all of them) and the Gendarmerie, they're losing men at some collosal rate.
    Brussels, riots, when???

    Some young ruffians torched some cars and a cafe a few weeks ago after some bloke died in custody but it was all a bit half-hearted really. Went on for a few nights, most of them got nicked, no-one really noticed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dundeegeorge
    replied
    They're just building a vacuum

    Originally posted by Nipple Clamp
    Chico, I'd have thought you militant Christians would be a lot more hostile than you are to the EU, which is basically atheist in outlook and dogmatically antithetical to any religion. No doubt there's an EU directive behind this if you do a bit of digging.
    in order that islam can flood in and become the european religion.
    You are aware I take it of the riots throughout Brussells during Ramadan, and lesser ones in Paris, although there's an ongoing war with 'disaffected muslim youth' (all of them) and the Gendarmerie, they're losing men at some collosal rate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nipple Clamp
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    Why am I not surprised at the way things are panning out in our schools
    Chico, I'd have thought you militant Christians would be a lot more hostile than you are to the EU, which is basically atheist in outlook and dogmatically antithetical to any religion. No doubt there's an EU directive behind this if you do a bit of digging.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    "I believe Fred West was considered an exemplary foster parent." - Sick.

    I understand that Ian Brady & Myra Hindley used to hate going on to the moors as they were sick of the kids being under their feet.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by snaw
    I guess no non-gay foster parents have ever abused a child in their care ...
    I believe Fred West was considered an exemplary foster parent.

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    Be careful what you wish for....

    Two men who sexually abused young boys placed in their foster care have been sent to prison.

    Ian Wathey, 41, was jailed for five years and his partner, Craig Faunch, 32, for six years after being found guilty of sex offences last month.

    After sentencing the pair, from Pontefract, West Yorkshire, a judge criticised Wakefield social services.

    She said it was "quite incredible" police were not involved at an earlier stage and demanded an explanation.

    Wathey and Faunch were found guilty following a two-week trial at Leeds Crown Court of abusing four boys aged between eight and 14.

    During the trial, the court was told the couple had taken a photo of a boy in their care while he was urinating. It was sent to Wakefield Council's social services department by the youngster's mother.


    Once you realised social services would not take any action and believed your ridiculous story, you went on to abuse others in your care, believing yourself safe from the authorities

    Social workers decided the men had been "naive and silly" for taking the photo after hearing their explanation that they had used the picture to embarrass the boys into closing the toilet door, which they kept failing to do.

    The men were using the boys for sexual gratification within months of being approved as carers in July 2003, the court heard.

    The judge said neither of the men had shown any "empathy, remorse or any responsibility for their actions".

    Referring to Faunch's abuse of a 14-year-old boy, she said: "You, Craig Faunch, chose to victimise and abuse that boy, showing the very depths in my view of what you are prepared to do.

    Faunch was convicted of two charges of making indecent photos of a child. The court was told that he used a camcorder to film two naked eight-year-old boys in the shower.

    He was also found guilty of five counts of sexual activity with a 14-year-old boy.

    Wathey was found guilty of four charges of sexual activity with a 14-year-old boy and encouraging a child to watch sexual activity.
    I guess no non-gay foster parents have ever abused a child in their care ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by snaw
    Given the choice of choosing between to have my child adopted by a gay couple or a a chico style christain couple I think all things being equal I'd be veering away from the religious nutjobs.
    Couldn't agree more. In the grand scheme of things, far more people have been harmed by religion than by homosexuals.

    Have we had a rant from Chico yet about catholic priests buggering small boys? If not, better get on to it son, while the whole gay thing is still on your radar.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    Also since most of our laws originate from a spiritual reference - i.e. the Bible etc. what would you replace those laws with?

    Simple. The humanist philosophy: If you woudn't like it done to you, then don't do it to someone else.

    Humanists. Placing people first (TM)

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by snaw
    Given the choice of choosing between to have my child adopted by a gay couple or a a chico style christain couple I think all things being equal I'd be veering away from the religious nutjobs.

    Be careful what you wish for....

    Two men who sexually abused young boys placed in their foster care have been sent to prison.

    Ian Wathey, 41, was jailed for five years and his partner, Craig Faunch, 32, for six years after being found guilty of sex offences last month.

    After sentencing the pair, from Pontefract, West Yorkshire, a judge criticised Wakefield social services.

    She said it was "quite incredible" police were not involved at an earlier stage and demanded an explanation.

    Wathey and Faunch were found guilty following a two-week trial at Leeds Crown Court of abusing four boys aged between eight and 14.

    During the trial, the court was told the couple had taken a photo of a boy in their care while he was urinating. It was sent to Wakefield Council's social services department by the youngster's mother.


    Once you realised social services would not take any action and believed your ridiculous story, you went on to abuse others in your care, believing yourself safe from the authorities

    Social workers decided the men had been "naive and silly" for taking the photo after hearing their explanation that they had used the picture to embarrass the boys into closing the toilet door, which they kept failing to do.

    The men were using the boys for sexual gratification within months of being approved as carers in July 2003, the court heard.

    The judge said neither of the men had shown any "empathy, remorse or any responsibility for their actions".

    Referring to Faunch's abuse of a 14-year-old boy, she said: "You, Craig Faunch, chose to victimise and abuse that boy, showing the very depths in my view of what you are prepared to do.

    Faunch was convicted of two charges of making indecent photos of a child. The court was told that he used a camcorder to film two naked eight-year-old boys in the shower.

    He was also found guilty of five counts of sexual activity with a 14-year-old boy.

    Wathey was found guilty of four charges of sexual activity with a 14-year-old boy and encouraging a child to watch sexual activity.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X