• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Kicking Off in Paris Again"

Collapse

  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Who armed and trained the Afghan rebels against the Russians in the early 80s?
    They went on to become the Taliban and took the country back centuries.
    Who sold Saddam his weapons, including chemical weapons that he was using on the kurds?
    Who created the power vacuums in Iraq and Libya by getting rid of Hussein and Gaddafi?
    Who armed and trained the rebels fighting against Assad in Syria?
    They went on to become ISIS


    But, no, the USA have played no part in this and that's from someone who's anything but a liberal. I'm a realist and if you can't see what America are up to, then there's no help for you.
    The middle east would have been a utopia of peace and prosperity had the Americans not intervened?

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Who armed and trained the Afghan rebels against the Russians in the early 80s?
    Rambo obviously, don't you watch the movies

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    If it wasn't for the US, we wouldn't have a War on Tourism.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Couple of pieces on that topic here, here and here.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Of course blam the Americans. Thd easiest target for liberal hypocrites
    Who armed and trained the Afghan rebels against the Russians in the early 80s?
    They went on to become the Taliban and took the country back centuries.
    Who sold Saddam his weapons, including chemical weapons that he was using on the kurds?
    Who created the power vacuums in Iraq and Libya by getting rid of Hussein and Gaddafi?
    Who armed and trained the rebels fighting against Assad in Syria?
    They went on to become ISIS

    But, no, the USA have played no part in this and that's from someone who's anything but a liberal. I'm a realist and if you can't see what America are up to, then there's no help for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    The supreme head jhiadette was from just up the road from me, she went to a really expensive girls school about a mile away.

    I hope she is on the kill list. But the excuse that these people are all disaffected working class Muslims is mistaken.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Swings and roundabouts. They are powerful but dangerous and erratic, and we have no way of telling which way they will swing or how it will affect us.

    It's certainly not a utopia. Our country might be "giving in to lefties" but we don't get monthly school massacres.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    If it wasn't for the US, we wouldn't have a War on Terror.
    Meaning what exactly?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    If the UK had the foresight to join Germany in 1939(as Hitler wanted) then both the USA and Soviets would have been totally stuffed.
    I cant even muster a reply to that bonkerness.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    If it wasn't for the US, we wouldn't have a War on Terror.
    Borat had it right. War of terror.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    If it wasn't for the USA we would be making widgets in a soviet factory.
    If it wasn't for the US, we wouldn't have a War on Terror.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    If it wasn't for the USA we would be making widgets in a soviet factory.
    If the UK had the foresight to join Germany in 1939(as Hitler wanted) then both the USA and Soviets would have been totally stuffed.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    What a surprise, to you the USA is some sort of wonderland.
    If it wasn't for the USA we would be making widgets in a soviet factory.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Of course blam the Americans. Thd easiest target for liberal hypocrites
    What a surprise, to you the USA is some sort of wonderland.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
    Well what do you guys think the correct approach for the western powers to take would be?
    If this has been done already - apologies but I caught this dialogue while watching Homeland - and the press have now picked up on it:

    In fact the scene when he tells the CIA and US military top brass the brutal truth about ISIS is worth reading in full:

    CIA official: You said a program should be renewed. I'm asking is our strategy working?

    Peter Quinn: What strategy?Tell me what the strategy is and I'll tell you if it's working. [Silence] See, that right there is the problem because they - they have a strategy. They're gathering right now in Raqqa by the tens of thousands, hidden in the civilian population, cleaning their weapons and they know exactly why they're there.

    CIA official: Why is that?

    Peter Quinn: They call it the end times. What do you think the be-headings are about? The crucifixions in Deir Hafer, the revival of slavery? Do you think they make this s*** up? It's all in the book. Their f****** book. The only book they ever read - they read it all the time. They never stop. They're there for one reason and one reason only: to die for the Caliphate and usher in a world without infidels. That's their strategy and it's been that way since the seventh century. So do you really think that a few special forces teams are going to put a dent in that?

    CIA official: Well what would you do?

    Peter Quinn: Are you offering me a promotion?

    CIA official: I'm offering you a hypothetical.

    Peter Quinn: Two-hundred thousand American troops on the ground indefinitely to provide security and support for an equal number of doctors and elementary school teachers.

    CIA official: Well that's not going to happen.

    Peter Quinn: Then I better get back there.

    CIA official: What else? What else would make a difference?

    Peter Quinn: Hit reset.

    CIA official: Meaning what?

    Peter Quinn: Meaning pound Raqqa (ISIS’s stronghold) into a parking lot.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X