• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Contract of the week"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NibblyPig View Post
    was thinking of that as I typed. However I'm not in my official capacity as Director of HMRC so there shouldn't be any consequences.

    Love Jim

    Leave a comment:


  • NibblyPig
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Of course, I'd fork that.
    Careful!

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by Milkyway View Post
    I wonder if these ClientCo(s) realise that once the IR35 shakeup in 2017 happens, they can't do all these rubbish contracts, and expect contractors to pick up roles as they engineer it on-demand
    They will only be left with permies to do these sh*t work/rates, or offer it to Big Consultancies (but that will come with its own costs)

    Seriously, I was expecting the the ClientCos will be worried about the IR35 changes more than the contractors themselves, since it will kill the flexible workforce that they enjoy now (especially at these throw away rates that they expect work to be done!).. but they seem to be in void about all this.
    Simple answer is to keep contracting and enjoy the skills shortage with higher rates for a couple of years until huge clientcos lobby gov to rethink the policy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Milkyway
    replied
    Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
    I was once sent a dev role where they were offering £80/day, I respectfully replied to the agent that I could probably earn more stacking shelves at B&Q. He seemed to sympathise with this but said his hands were tied as it was the ClientCo that were offering such a pittance.
    I wonder if these ClientCo(s) realise that once the IR35 shakeup in 2017 happens, they can't do all these rubbish contracts, and expect contractors to pick up roles as they engineer it on-demand
    They will only be left with permies to do these sh*t work/rates, or offer it to Big Consultancies (but that will come with its own costs)

    Seriously, I was expecting the the ClientCos will be worried about the IR35 changes more than the contractors themselves, since it will kill the flexible workforce that they enjoy now (especially at these throw away rates that they expect work to be done!).. but they seem to be in void about all this.

    Leave a comment:


  • psychocandy
    replied
    Prob £900 or so for 12 hr night shift minimum I reckon.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    Would your average linux man give more pleasure?
    That would depend on the quality of the service administered by your Windows Admin .

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    Leeds hookers are cheaper than that, if you are talking hourly rate.

    Would your average linux man give more pleasure?
    Of course, I'd fork that.

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Sounds like they got day rate mixed up with an hourly rate, it happens.
    Leeds hookers are cheaper than that, if you are talking hourly rate.

    Would your average linux man give more pleasure?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    I was once sent a dev role where they were offering £80/day,
    Sounds like they got day rate mixed up with an hourly rate, it happens.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
    I was once sent a dev role where they were offering £80/day, I respectfully replied to the agent that I could probably earn more stacking shelves at B&Q. He seemed to sympathise with this but said his hands were tied as it was the ClientCo that were offering such a pittance.
    What did they want developing, hamburgers?

    Leave a comment:


  • rl4engc
    replied
    I was once sent a dev role where they were offering £80/day, I respectfully replied to the agent that I could probably earn more stacking shelves at B&Q. He seemed to sympathise with this but said his hands were tied as it was the ClientCo that were offering such a pittance.

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    Gotta respect the dog barf. Good call.

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    Maybe that's the going rate for those skills in the market ...
    Yes that's why I posted it.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    Maybe that's the going rate for those skills in the market ...
    It's Norfolk so the applicants will be able to count how many £K they are paid on their fingers.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X