• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "F'Wittery of the highest level"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Er, why is that f***witted?
    Well if I were trying to sell such a policy to the electorate, 90% of which don't have anywhere near £100k household earnings, I wouldn't be surprised if the electorate objected to subsidising the rich.

    We just had a discussion about BTL where people were horrified Landlords may pay the interest on mortgages like any other business because they were rich Boomers, now the government is throwing taxpayers cash at the top 10% to buy half million pound houses and people are saying why not.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    £100k is the new living wage.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Less the Govt 40%. Less the 20% VAT when you spend it.
    Less NICs, less massive fuel duty etc etc - can somebody on £100k afford a private school for just one of their children? Can't see that being possible, so how can it be called rich?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Er, why is that f***witted?

    These days even £100K a year doesn't allow much of a mortgage, as a multiple of income, compared with the prices of most family houses.

    Also, shifting a few medium income families into "better" houses, makes more opportunities for buyers into the low end.

    You sound like another smug old "veteran?" house owner, like FatLazyContractor, out of touch with the realities of today's property market.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    less my 20%
    Less the Govt 40%. Less the 20% VAT when you spend it.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    £100k isn't rich.
    less my 20%

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Interesting

    Is it the fault of the government

    or is it the fault of the greedy feckers who knew damn well the loans were not for them but thought so what and did it anyway

    ok the rules and controls should have been better but is it acceptable to just grab grab grab just because you can?
    I don't know, those money grabbing contractors that flagrantly avoided paying NI would say "it was legal so what"

    In my opinion something like this should be written to avoid the wrong people claiming, its not Rocket science

    (either applicant / owner Earnings > average) or (any applicant not first property purchase) = refusal.
    Last edited by vetran; 9 September 2015, 14:17.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Interesting

    Is it the fault of the government

    or is it the fault of the greedy feckers who knew damn well the loans were not for them but thought so what and did it anyway

    ok the rules and controls should have been better but is it acceptable to just grab grab grab just because you can?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Free tax payer funded, freshly printed money. What's not to like?

    Fill yer boots!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    £100k isn't rich.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic F'Wittery of the highest level

    F'Wittery of the highest level

    George Osborne's 'help to buy' loans have gone to 1.7k couples earning £100k | Daily Mail Online

    Help to Buy helps the rich: 1,750 couples earning £100,000 get Osborne's cheap loans (including 500 who ALREADY had a house)
    The government's 'help to buy' scheme helps people get a mortgage
    Anyone who saves a 5% deposit can get a 20% loan from the government
    Scheme has been used to help some of Britain's wealthiest couples
    Hundreds of homes worth over £500,000 have been bought on scheme
    is anyone surprised

Working...
X