- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Quality Assurance in Software Engineering"
Collapse
-
Try working in IT for a Japanese car manufacturer if you want to see it done properly.
-
He owns a Bull ?!!Originally posted by vetran View Postspray drying his B*llsh*t to use as fertilizer? It could cure world hunger.
Leave a comment:
-
Were you spray testing summat there?Originally posted by Martin Scroatman View PostMy recent visit to a spray drier plant in Devon gave me first hand exposure to quality control in action in the context of a production line scenario and it got me thinking about quality and its relation to the software engineering process.
Leave a comment:
-
Quality Assurance in Software Engineering
My recent visit to a spray drier plant in Devon gave me first hand exposure to quality control in action in the context of a production line scenario and it got me thinking about quality and its relation to the software engineering process.
We have the quality controllers - the testers but we by no means have an integrated Quality Assurance function. Elements that could be incorporated into an integrated programme are largely carried out by disparate parties. I include among these code reviews, employment of code analysis tools, enforcement of unit testing and code coverage.
Should all these be incorporated into a separate body vis a vis manufacturing industry thus imposing a Quality Assurance layer on what is already arguably a complex administrative structure?
Indeed, is it wise to apply management processes taken from manufacturing industry where perhaps processes aren't readily transferable from the start stop nature of the production line to the environment of the software house?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Leave a comment: