• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "OMG… Greenland’s ice sheets are melting fast"

Collapse

  • pjclarke
    replied
    Originally posted by Benny View Post
    Me thunk the Manhattan was built as a bog standard oil tanker - but did have an icebreaker
    bow fitted for the voyage.
    Dedicated icebreakers in addition to the strengthened bow also have a specialist hull design which the Manhattan did not (to move the broken ice away from vulnerable propellers / rudders etc. )and lots of welly in the engines
    There are modern "double acting tankers" available since the 1990's which use a stern first approach to ice breaking (yes really!) and forward pointing for open water
    HTH
    Thanks, you're right.

    Manhattan* '​s route began in August 1969 on the east coast of North America and transited the passage from east to west via the Baffin Sea and Viscount Melville Sound. The master of Manhattan was Captain Roger A. Steward. Heavy sea ice blocked the way through M'Clure Strait, so a more southerly route through Prince of Wales Strait and south of Banks Island was used. A single, token barrel of crude oil was loaded at Prudhoe Bay and then the ship went back. She was escorted by the Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker CCGS John A. Macdonald. At various times during the expedition, Manhattan was supported by the icebreakers CCGS Louis S. St-Laurent, USCGC Staten Island, and USCGC Northwind.
    Page is still a , tho'

    Leave a comment:


  • Benny
    replied
    Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
    But, for some reason he omits to mention that, while the passage is today described as 'fully navigable' in 1969 it was only traversible using the Manhattan - the biggest icebreaker in the world, an
    Me thunk the Manhattan was built as a bog standard oil tanker - but did have an icebreaker
    bow fitted for the voyage.
    Dedicated icebreakers in addition to the strengthened bow also have a specialist hull design which the Manhattan did not (to move the broken ice away from vulnerable propellers / rudders etc. )and lots of welly in the engines
    There are modern "double acting tankers" available since the 1990's which use a stern first approach to ice breaking (yes really!) and forward pointing for open water
    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Fourth lowest minimum in the satellite era, as I predicted, hailed a 'recovery' in some quarters ...

    Some more context on the fourth-lowest-on-record ice figure might also be provided by recent research showing that the arctic ice cap has staged a remarkable recovery in recent years.
    writes Lewis Page at El Reg. He also points out that

    There still weren't any ice-scanner satellites during the summer minimum of 1969, when the 100,000-ton supertanker Manhattan - at the time the largest merchant vessel on the US registry - transited the Northwest Passage. The M'Clure strait was blocked then, too, just as it is this year, but the Manhattan got through via a route south of Banks Island. It sounds as though ice conditions that summer may not have been too dissimilar to this year.
    But, for some reason he omits to mention that, while the passage is today described as 'fully navigable' in 1969 it was only traversible using the Manhattan - the biggest icebreaker in the world, and she was accompanied by 4 other super-ice-breakers, which one might have thought was relevant, in an article on sea-ice. Gotta love the Reg!
    Last edited by pjclarke; 16 September 2015, 14:01.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
    How would you explain that with the lack of pirates in the Artic ?
    They have galleons not ice-breakers. HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    More science pseudo bollux
    Fake bollux? Is that truth?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
    It has (probably) hit bottom, 1.8 million km2 below the average minimum.
    More science pseudo bollux. No-one has any idea what is going on.

    The only things one can be sure of are death, the sun rising and so called scientists(the new priests) spouting nonsense to get attention.

    This post applies to AGW acceptors and deniers.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    It has (probably) hit bottom, 1.8 million km2 below the average minimum.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I'm pre-empting your "report" that the sea ice in the Arctic has increased by 12km^2.
    Do you seriously believe that this is the only glacier to calve, or that sublimation is not a massive factor ?

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I'm pre-empting your "report" that the sea ice in the Arctic has increased by 12km^2.
    How would you explain that with the lack of pirates in the Artic ?

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I'm pre-empting your "report" that the sea ice in the Arctic has increased by 12km^2.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    What on earth are you gibbering about ?


    I'm pre-empting your "report" that the sea ice in the Arctic has increased by 12km^2.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Based on the title of the thread...
    Greenland's Jakobshavn Glacier sheds big ice chunk - BBC News


    ...of course, this is fictitious because in 1983 there was one hot day in Northern Ireland, which proves all the scientists wrong.
    Also the calving has increased the amount of ocean ice for a while (what was once considered land ice is now sea ice), which I'm sure will be reported by some as further proof that the scientists are wrong.
    What on earth are you gibbering about ?

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Based on the title of the thread...
    Greenland's Jakobshavn Glacier sheds big ice chunk - BBC News


    ...of course, this is fictitious because in 1983 there was one hot day in Northern Ireland, which proves all the scientists wrong.
    Also the calving has increased the amount of ocean ice for a while (what was once considered land ice is now sea ice), which I'm sure will be reported by some as further proof that the scientists are wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Dropping like the Shanghai Composite.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    PS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_Bremen

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X