• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Is this the end of National Insurance?"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    The Govt will only change it if and only if it raises more tax revenue.

    Period.

    Therefore any changes are bad...

    Leave a comment:


  • Waldorf
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    What about employer's NI?
    They could still operate this, perhaps call it what it is, a Employer Payroll Tax.

    Leave a comment:


  • Waldorf
    replied
    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
    Unless they move to a tax on turnover
    You mean VAT!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    There is a whole parasitic industry around our complex tax laws.

    If they were simplified like in a lots of countries over half the parasites would have to find new jobs....
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    There is a whole industry around our complex tax laws.

    If they were simplified like in a lots of countries over half the industry would have to find new jobs....
    Oh dear...

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    sasguru isn't returning...
    <cough> Euler

    (Mind you, even under that alter ego he hasn't been around for a while.)

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    Not so fast, young man. 2015 is far from over, there is still time for better candidates.
    sasguru isn't returning...

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    You are correct from a point of view of a cretin who does not see the big picture and does not want to see it.

    I hereby declare you the official CUK Cretin of the Year 2015.
    Not so fast, young man. 2015 is far from over, there is still time for better candidates.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    I'm hugely in favour of the income tax/NI merge which was actually promised in 20101972. NI is so complex that most people don't know how much they pay, in what class, or why. Governments have used NI as an entire stealth ecosystem to bury taxes in. And of course NI is the natural enemy of the contractor, who must pay 2 sets of it (umbrella) or none (Ltd/dividends).

    Throw out this rats nest and replace it with a nice tidy cupboard. And the same goes for the rest of the labyrinthine tax laws that give huge avoidance to the big boys, while fining the little people £100 if they so much as send a form in late.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    You are correct from a point of view of a cretin who does not see the big picture and does not want to see it.
    Like I said, employees.

    When you were an employee, did you know/care about your employer's tax situation? Just because you now hire 2 employees at £17k a year, doesn't mean everyone else worries about your NI payments.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    From the point of view of an employee, I am right. A typical employee has absolutely zero idea how much NI their employer has to pay, they only care about their salary and how much of it they get to keep.
    You are correct from a point of view of a cretin who does not see the big picture and does not want to see it.

    I hereby declare you the official CUK Cretin of the Year 2015.

    Well done!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    I'm hugely in favour of the income tax/NI merge which was actually promised in 2010. NI is so complex that most people don't know how much they pay, in what class, or why. Governments have used NI as an entire stealth ecosystem to bury taxes in. And of course NI is the natural enemy of the contractor, who must pay 2 sets of it (umbrella) or none (Ltd/dividends).

    Throw out this rats nest and replace it with a nice tidy cupboard. And the same goes for the rest of the labyrinthine tax laws that give huge avoidance to the big boys, while fining the little people £100 if they so much as send a form in late.
    There is a whole industry around our complex tax laws.

    If they were simplified like in a lots of countries over half the industry would have to find new jobs....

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    I'm hugely in favour of the income tax/NI merge which was actually promised in 2010. NI is so complex that most people don't know how much they pay, in what class, or why. Governments have used NI as an entire stealth ecosystem to bury taxes in. And of course NI is the natural enemy of the contractor, who must pay 2 sets of it (umbrella) or none (Ltd/dividends).

    Throw out this rats nest and replace it with a nice tidy cupboard. And the same goes for the rest of the labyrinthine tax laws that give huge avoidance to the big boys, while fining the little people £100 if they so much as send a form in late.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    You are, Sir, a true
    From the point of view of an employee, I am right. A typical employee has absolutely zero idea how much NI their employer has to pay, they only care about their salary and how much of it they get to keep.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Employer's NI isn't relevant - it doesn't come out of the salary you receive.
    You are, Sir, a true

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X