• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Boundary changes

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Boundary changes"

Collapse

  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    So Cameron is going to reduce the number of MPs from 650 to 600. That seems easy. Reduce the 59 Scottish constituencies to just 9. This also has the advantage of reducing Scottish influence over English-only issues.
    Reduce the number of Scottish constituencies in Westminster to zero. This has the additional advantage of eliminating English influence over Scottish issues, which we have had too much of for too long. 308 years too long. We're a conservative people but we have just had enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    Countries make up Europe and Countries make up the UK, your point is facile.
    Except the UK joined as a country and the UK has been treated as a single country for rather a long time. It's the UK that is a member of the EU, not the historical countries or counties. Hell we could split to the more ancient kingdoms like Mercia, Wessex, Kent, Northumbria if we followed your country argument another logical stage.

    The United States is (viewed externally) a single country but the individual states are far more autonomous than the "countries" in the UK.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    Did you see Sturgeon is claiming that the EU referendum should have to have a majority in each of the four nations to pass? She doesn't want the English to drag Scotland out of Europe.

    I guess the next Scottish referendum should have to have a majority in each Scottish council area to pass, too. Orkney and Shetland don't want the Glaswegians to drag them out of the UK, after all.
    She should be campaigning to stay in the UK then, as independence will guarantee not being in the EU

    Leave a comment:


  • Batcher
    replied
    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    Did you see Sturgeon is claiming that the EU referendum should have to have a majority in each of the four nations to pass? She doesn't want the English to drag Scotland out of Europe.

    I guess the next Scottish referendum should have to have a majority in each Scottish council area to pass, too. Orkney and Shetland don't want the Glaswegians to drag them out of the UK, after all.
    I blame those damned separatists for trying to break away. Cameron, Osborne, Farage, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    Did you see Sturgeon is claiming that the EU referendum should have to have a majority in each of the four nations to pass? She doesn't want the English to drag Scotland out of Europe.

    I guess the next Scottish referendum should have to have a majority in each Scottish council area to pass, too. Orkney and Shetland don't want the Glaswegians to drag them out of the UK, after all.
    Countries make up Europe and Countries make up the UK, your point is facile.

    Leave a comment:


  • WordIsBond
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    I'm sorry, that argument is simply unacceptable, you should be ashamed. It makes far too much sense for CUK let alone UK politics.
    Sorry. Your point is taken. But I put it in "General," I thought fantasy was permitted here.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    Did you see Sturgeon is claiming that the EU referendum should have to have a majority in each of the four nations to pass? She doesn't want the English to drag Scotland out of Europe.

    I guess the next Scottish referendum should have to have a majority in each Scottish council area to pass, too. Orkney and Shetland don't want the Glaswegians to drag them out of the UK, after all.
    I'm sorry, that argument is simply unacceptable, you should be ashamed. It makes far too much sense for CUK let alone UK politics.

    Leave a comment:


  • WordIsBond
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Honestly, if the vote had been for the rest of the UK as to whether to kick Scotland out I expect the result would have been very different!
    Did you see Sturgeon is claiming that the EU referendum should have to have a majority in each of the four nations to pass? She doesn't want the English to drag Scotland out of Europe.

    I guess the next Scottish referendum should have to have a majority in each Scottish council area to pass, too. Orkney and Shetland don't want the Glaswegians to drag them out of the UK, after all.

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    You had your chance to get rid of all 59 and reduce Scottish influence to zero, but you had to come up and beg us to stay with your vow and promising the moon along with a megaton of FUD. Now you will have to pay the price
    Honestly, if the vote had been for the rest of the UK as to whether to kick Scotland out I expect the result would have been very different!

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Racist?

    Shirley Knot!

    Ignorant of Irish history, I'd agree with you.

    Hello everyone and possibly goodbye when NAT reads his PMs.
    yeah dude, welcome back, however brief

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Racist?

    Shirley Knot!

    Ignorant of Irish history, I'd agree with you.

    Hello everyone and possibly goodbye when NAT reads his PMs.
    Welcome back

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    I would take anything NAT says with a pinch of salt, given his history of racism.
    Racist?

    Shirley Knot!

    Ignorant of Irish history, I'd agree with you.

    Hello everyone and possibly goodbye when NAT reads his PMs.

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    Scottish population is 8.4% of the UK -- if it's exactly prorata, it should be 50 Scottish seats. 29 for Wales, 17 for NI, 504 for England.
    I would take anything NAT says with a pinch of salt, given his history of racism.

    Leave a comment:


  • WordIsBond
    replied
    Scottish population is 8.4% of the UK -- if it's exactly prorata, it should be 50 Scottish seats. 29 for Wales, 17 for NI, 504 for England.

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    So Cameron is going to reduce the number of MPs from 650 to 600. That seems easy. Reduce the 59 Scottish constituencies to just 9. This also has the advantage of reducing Scottish influence over English-only issues.
    You had your chance to get rid of all 59 and reduce Scottish influence to zero, but you had to come up and beg us to stay with your vow and promising the moon along with a megaton of FUD. Now you will have to pay the price

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X