• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Sorry MF

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Sorry MF"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    OK I'm confused

    A female writer mentions less than perfect male bodies may be more attractive than those with strict waxing and workout routines or steroid abuse because it indicates they may be more fun in a relationship.

    Guys know instinctively high maintenance girls are normally a PITA by the way.

    We then have a Fem'de-man'ist declaring men should write similar about girls. Deciding by their Body shapes if they are worthy or sexy. Yeah love like I'm going to do that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    started a topic Sorry MF

    Sorry MF

    I know you're overqualified for this...

    The "Dad bod"

    Stupid comment towards the end...
    others would like the "Mum Bod" to be considered sexy too
    I'm guessing the "others" are overweight women. Sorry, but sexual equality doesn't mean you get to decide what people find sexy or not.

Working...
X