Originally posted by Gumbo Robot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: In or Out of the EU
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "In or Out of the EU"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TestMangler View PostNot disagreeing that it will be a resounding 'yes' this time round. What I was saying was that had the full facts and plans been known first time round, it would have been a 'no'.
Remember this was only 30ish years after the end of WWII and it was sold as 'breaking down trade barriers between European countries'.
I only remember it because there was a football match to commemorate it, The 6 v The 3.
Any claims that we're sleepwalking into a European superstate ( which its patently obvious we are) will be met with howls of dersion from the establishment mouthpieces.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gumbo Robot View PostIt will be a resounding Yes, make no mistake about it... ok, perhaps not resounding but yes nonetheless.
I haven't seen any recent opinion polls on this recently but I'd imagine that the No camp would have the advantage at the moment and will probably continue to do so until the last minute when various captains of industry will be wheeled out to to put the frighteners on the gullible voting public vis á vis job security, pensions etc. pretty much the same as they did with the Scots referendum.
And they will be given a much bigger platform on which to do it than will anyone dissenting from this view.
Remember this was only 30ish years after the end of WWII and it was sold as 'breaking down trade barriers between European countries'.
I only remember it because there was a football match to commemorate it, The 6 v The 3.Last edited by TestMangler; 25 May 2015, 09:58.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TestMangler View PostHate to agree with the Prawn but this is exactly right. We increased 'common market' membership to nine countries at that point. If anyone had seen what was to come, I think it would have been a resounding 'no'.
I haven't seen any recent opinion polls on this recently but I'd imagine that the No camp would have the advantage at the moment and will probably continue to do so until the last minute when various captains of industry will be wheeled out to to put the frighteners on the gullible voting public vis á vis job security, pensions etc. pretty much the same as they did with the Scots referendum.
And they will be given a much bigger platform on which to do it than will anyone dissenting from this view.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostIt was a "common market" meant to ease free trade, that was it. Nothing more.
Now it's an all encompassing EU superstate with our legal right to control most aspects of our lives dictated without any democratic basis.
No one voted for this.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostAgreed on all points. Cloud cuckoo land of course due to the piggies at the trough element, but you never know in an alternate reality it might happen.
As an EU functionary, even if you were just a regular PM, you'd have your own office, secretary, private education for your kids and you'd get your lunch wheeled in on a trolley every day.
Most of us IT bods who were drafted in via 3rd party suppliers never lived this high life though.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tractor View PostI could support the EU if...
- It was accountable
- It was auditable
- If it was not so expensive to remain a member and there were not so many piggies at the trough
- If it did not waste money on stupid projects that benefit very few
- If it did not participate in fraud to allow states that would otherwise be disqualified from membership to join
- If it treated all members equally when it comes to sanctions for non compliance
- If it was ONLY for a common market
- If it didn't poke its socialist nose into everything
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tractor View PostI could support the EU if...
- It was accountable
- It was auditable
- If it was not so expensive to remain a member and there were not so many piggies at the trough
- If it did not waste money on stupid projects that benefit very few
- If it did not participate in fraud to allow states that would otherwise be disqualified from membership to join
- If it treated all members equally when it comes to sanctions for non compliance
- If it was ONLY for a common market
- If it didn't poke its socialist nose into everything
It is a little puzzling that the overwhelming lean to the Tories in the GE by posters here is not matched by their view on the EU
Likewise not all Labour party members and elected politicians want to be in the EU.
In fact the only parties who consistently want to be part of the EU are the smaller parties such as the Greens and what is left of the Lib Dems.
Be aware by elected politicians I mean anyone from councillors to MPs to MEPs. Lots of MPs were councillors before they got their seats.......
Leave a comment:
-
...
I could support the EU if...
- It was accountable
- It was auditable
- If it was not so expensive to remain a member and there were not so many piggies at the trough
- If it did not waste money on stupid projects that benefit very few
- If it did not participate in fraud to allow states that would otherwise be disqualified from membership to join
- If it treated all members equally when it comes to sanctions for non compliance
- If it was ONLY for a common market
- If it didn't poke its socialist nose into everything
It is a little puzzling that the overwhelming lean to the Tories in the GE by posters here is not matched by their view on the EU
Leave a comment:
-
It was a "common market" meant to ease free trade, that was it. Nothing more.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostAnd those that voted did not vote for the EU we have now.
Now it's an all encompassing EU superstate with our legal right to control most aspects of our lives dictated without any democratic basis.
No one voted for this.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostI wonder if the EU referendum question will be anything like the UKIP one for a change in the voting system: Yes or undecided
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
I wonder if the EU referendum question will be anything like the UKIP one for a change in the voting system: Yes or undecided
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zero Liability View PostSomething closer to "should the UK become a third world country like Wales?"
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: