Originally posted by Batcher
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Crapita...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Crapita..."
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by SlipTheJab View PostSo QDOS insurance is a waste of time by the sounds of it (money making exercise?), god bless the PCG/IPSE!
In my view though, PCG/IPSE+ is all you need for peace of mind.
Leave a comment:
-
isn't that the case for most insurances though. Happy to take the premiums but would much rather you never made a claim.
Sounds a poor show though Batcher, fair play to you making it out the other side.
Leave a comment:
-
So QDOS insurance is a waste of time by the sounds of it (money making exercise?), god bless the PCG/IPSE!
Leave a comment:
-
Just never had to use any insurances yet after contracting for fourteen years, so it's interesting to see real world cases
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostAnd what was their excuse/reasoning for this ?
My case was passed around various people in QDOS so I kept having to update the new person with my case details which I'm sure didn't help. Eventually PCG gave me advice on how to deal with HMRC at the point we were at which I passed onto QDOS and they acted on it. The case was quietly dropped a few months later.
In hindsight I should have gone straight to PCG but I had the QDOS insurance specifically for IR35 so that seemed like the correct thing to do.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batcher View PostQDOS let me down at the time so I stopped their IR35 insurance. They wanted me to pay the £7k to take my case to the commissioners which I thought was exactly why I had the insurance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI can't argue any of that but you get three free contract checks with QDOS PI/PL so why not.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batcher View PostI haven't had a contract checked for years.
Ever since my IR35 investigation when HMRC got Clientco's HR department to agree to what they said my working practices were despite me having signed CoA from the HoD who actually knew what I did. My contract had been checked but was disregarded by HMRC.
I feel that I can decide if a contract is outside and can get it altered if it's a bit dubious. No point in spending hundreds of £ to get it checked when HMRC will ignore it anyway.
Apart from that, I think IR35 is a dead duck and is only used to frighten newbies into paying more tax than they need to. If you are a member of IPSE+ and have confidence you are within the rules then you have nothing to fear.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAh.. No point having a contract check then.
Ever since my IR35 investigation when HMRC got Clientco's HR department to agree to what they said my working practices were despite me having signed CoA from the HoD who actually knew what I did. My contract had been checked but was disregarded by HMRC.
I feel that I can decide if a contract is outside and can get it altered if it's a bit dubious. No point in spending hundreds of £ to get it checked when HMRC will ignore it anyway.
Apart from that, I think IR35 is a dead duck and is only used to frighten newbies into paying more tax than they need to. If you are a member of IPSE+ and have confidence you are within the rules then you have nothing to fear.
Leave a comment:
-
It goes with the territory.
If you wanna work under CL1 then this is what is required
If you wanna work in banking expected similar
it has become the norm.
CL1 contracts are now pretty much ok (still get these checked), but it is the working practices which you will need to get confirmed.
good luck
Leave a comment:
-
Every time I am asked for scanned documents etc, I keep a secure copy which I can then just use next time, ok until I realize the copy of my passport I have on file expired years ago
Leave a comment:
-
.....
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThis does mean crapita destroys paperwork.
To be fair, they used to be great, one of my best contracts was with them, then they fell into bed with the government and it all went wrong from there.....
Leave a comment:
-
Thankfully it's via an agency to capita so I'm fairly insulated from it but it did takes them 6 weeks to refuse a rate increase last renewal...
Leave a comment:
-
Many moons ago I worked as a perm for Capita - I have never come across such an incompetent bunch of cockhandlers in my life.
I have turned contracts down since due to their being Capita involvement*.
*I will admit I probably wouldn't have been so principled/choosy had my warchest been been hollow.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Today 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Leave a comment: