• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "This Farage Immigrants with HIV Business"

Collapse

  • RSoles
    replied
    Gosh, that's interesting.
    I have Myasthenia Gravis too, going on to treatment with Azathioprine next month.
    Had my Thymus out, still the bloody same.....
    Currently on Mestinon and Prednisolone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Major Hassle
    replied
    Originally posted by ASB View Post
    Myasthenia gravis. I am treated with 6 weekly infusions of immuno globulin. I believe that something in the order of 300 people are treated in this way.

    edit: having found a report on nhs costing I may be as expensive to look after as I thought. My basis was original treatment paid for by my insurers. The chared was approx 900 for each of the 15 bottles. The usage report seems to suggest current nhs costs are abot 500.
    My wife has Myasthenia Gravis - was treated with Immuno Globin infusions until the Azathioprine sent it into medicated remission. Consultant based in Oxford top bloke, hope you're coping well it's a vile disease.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Euler View Post
    You're being childish and ignorant.
    I've experienced other health services and the NHS on an ongoing basis for MIL's dementia. As well as a few other instances where I used it myself.
    And it's very bad.
    This generation of old people usually have no benchmark to compare the service they receive, the next generation will have travelled and lived in other places and they won't tolerate the stuff that goes on currently.
    There are still people around who remember life before the NHS. I know OAPs born before 1948. While group who actually properly remember anything is getting smaller but they also have children who are OAPs who they have passed their terror stories to of their own birth, siblings' births and illnesses before the NHS. The fact that it was sometimes just advances in medicine that caused the changes are ignored.

    I also know people who use the NHS for chronic childhood conditions and some get first class service whilst others get terrible treatment. However once both groups get to adulthood if they still have the condition the service goes down hill in all cases. Many are suppose to be deal with mainly in primary care by GPs who often know SFA about their condition so they end up going to A&E more frequently than they should.

    Leave a comment:


  • Euler
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Nah, all you do is the one trick pony calling everyone else ill informed cretins, I don't dare trying to contribute anything that will make your braincell jump to a different track. God only knows what the side effects would be.
    I don't think even the best health system in the world can do anything for a congenital cretin like you
    Have a good w/e!

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Euler View Post
    Try and contribiute something other than drivel for a change.
    Nah, all you do is the one trick pony calling everyone else ill informed cretins, I don't dare trying to contribute anything that will make your braincell jump to a different track. God only knows what the side effects would be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Euler
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    You've been practising it for so long and put so much effort in, it must have got easier for even you to do by now?
    Try and contribiute something other than drivel for a change.

    Leave a comment:


  • Euler
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    The question is, have they seen/experienced any system other than the NHS?
    Quite!

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Euler View Post
    It can't be easy being such a div
    You've been practising it for so long and put so much effort in, it must have got easier for even you to do by now?

    Leave a comment:


  • Euler
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    The old people I know are grateful for the NHS.

    To say people who disagree with you are brainwashed is egotistical drivel.

    "Look dear, all the other kids in the marching band are out of time. I'm so proud Euler is the only one doing it right".
    You're being childish and ignorant.
    I've experienced other health services and the NHS on an ongoing basis for MIL's dementia. As well as a few other instances where I used it myself.
    And it's very bad.
    This generation of old people usually have no benchmark to compare the service they receive, the next generation will have travelled and lived in other places and they won't tolerate the stuff that goes on currently.

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    The old people I know are grateful for the NHS.
    The question is, have they seen/experienced any system other than the NHS?

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But virtually all of us will have been reliant on it for a fair proportion of our lives - early careers, childhood if we didn't have wealthy parents, etc.
    It is not a free out of the sky service, is it? Someone is paying for it.

    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    How many of us wouldn't have got to the point of being wealthy and un-needing of the NHS if it hadn't been there in the past?.
    Basic healthcare was what "most" of us needed when we were young. Basic fundamental bog-standard isn't a privilege.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    The old people I know are grateful for the NHS.

    To say people who disagree with you are brainwashed is egotistical drivel.

    "Look dear, all the other kids in the marching band are out of time. I'm so proud Euler is the only one doing it right".

    Leave a comment:


  • Euler
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Even the right believes in the NHS. Only the real far right oppose it, and if you look at what else those people believe, it's clear they can be discounted as reasonable-minded individuals.

    It's all too easy for people who can afford private healthcare to say the NHS isn't a good idea. But virtually all of us will have been reliant on it for a fair proportion of our lives - early careers, childhood if we didn't have wealthy parents, etc. How many of us wouldn't have got to the point of being wealthy and un-needing of the NHS if it hadn't been there in the past?

    The implementation may suck but "bad public services" is NOT a tautology, regardless what those who have let the privilege of money brainwash them to believe.
    In my earlier post I talked about brainwashing.
    I rest my case.
    Even more "socialist" countries like France (which was long reckoned to have the best health system in the world) don't have a completely socialistic model like the NHS.
    But if you're ok with mediocrity, with having the worst cancer outcomes in the Western world for example, then you carry on.
    You'll figure it out when you're old.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Even the right believes in the NHS. Only the real far right oppose it, and if you look at what else those people believe, it's clear they can be discounted as reasonable-minded individuals.

    It's all too easy for people who can afford private healthcare to say the NHS isn't a good idea. But virtually all of us will have been reliant on it for a fair proportion of our lives - early careers, childhood if we didn't have wealthy parents, etc. How many of us wouldn't have got to the point of being wealthy and un-needing of the NHS if it hadn't been there in the past?

    The implementation may suck but "bad public services" is NOT a tautology, regardless what those who have let the privilege of money brainwash them to believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • Euler
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    The top level of health insurance in countries without an NHS is much more than that.

    Private health in the UK piggybacks on top of the NHS.
    The US is silly with its healthcare costs.
    The US and UK health systems are opposite extremes.
    The more successful health systems usually take a middle way.

    Sadly the left have managed to brainwash most UK citizens that the NHS is the best way.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X