Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Just spoke to the agent. I'm going to bill at the end of the week, to be paid next week, and from then on monthly with a 7 day payment. Eventually it will revert to their 28 days, but not for a couple of months.
The 30 days payment terms aren't unusual. They're standard if you're going direct, so I guess the agent isn't getting paid much more often either. I mentioned this on another thread.
Personally I would have gone for weekly invoicing though. Credit cards (especially zero percent ones as someone has already said) will delay the day of reckoning. I wouldn't bank on the agent paying on time though - maybe more like 40-45 days if you include processing and clearing, especially if they only do one payment run a week. You could always ask the bank for an arrangment on your business account, especially as you have already got a contract and presumably some invoices as evidence of future income.
If your business has 5 years worth of cash in the company accounts then I would say this is "wasted" opportunity. If it is quick liquidable assets yielding more than bank rate interest then fair enough.
Yes, naturally it should be in assets that can be quickly liquidated - certainly some cash in bank, say 6-12 months, and the rest is in bonds or what not.
5 years is probably paranoid, but 1 year is absolute minimum IMO, 2-3 is reasonably good area.
Every business should have enough cash ready to sustain zero cashflow for at least a year, better 3-5.
Alexei,
If your business has 5 years worth of cash in the company accounts then I would say this is "wasted" opportunity. If it is quick liquidable assets yielding more than bank rate interest then fair enough.
Just to put another view on this payment lark: We had several contracts with a major global top FTSE player who had just outsourced their whole accountancy department to....
...none other than our benevolent Bangalore monkey friends.
Needless to say, we didn't have any payments from them for over 5 months and we were competing for payment with companies such as TNT (who could turn around and say we're not doing business with you until you resolve our accounts) whereas we couldn't.
We finally got paid (fortunately we had stage payments - this is also negotiable and can be problematic with your cash flow) and as goodwill from the client, negotiated a much higher 1st stage payment for all future projects as a result of this.
The bottom line is that a company MUST have sufficient cash flow to allow for abortions like the above scenario and also must have cash/insurance put aside for non-payment of creditors.
We've only learnt by our mistakes and luckily, we managed to pull through.
Also, apart from being illegal to draw down cash that has been reserved for tax/VAT, some business accounts do not have an overdraft facility.
Leave a comment: