I agree with Simon.
My definition of a "Warchest" is a number of months of cash to cover living expenses and not something to be invested. The number of months cover varies according to your appetite for risk and the amount per required per month obviously varies according to personal circumstances.
As a 40-something male with a young family I have a low tolerance to risk and significant monthly expenses! Mine would cover me for 12 months. If I were 28 again it would be substantially less.
The "warchest" is completely separate in my financial planning and I don't include it in my investment portfolio.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Investments
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Investments"
Collapse
-
You don't get 10% risk free
http://http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-offshore-wind-industry-goes-from-boom-to-bust-a-914158.html
Wind power is a risky business indeed.
The highest returns long term are on the stock market, but you need a balanced portfolio.
You might want to look at some investment funds.Last edited by BlasterBates; 29 January 2015, 23:14.
Leave a comment:
-
With a minimum lock in of three years that kinda defeats the object of having a warchest to cover lulls in gigs?Originally posted by JRCT View PostThere are lots of posts regarding making your warchest work for you.
I just found this so thought I would post in case it's of any interest to anyone. I'm not promoting this.
Aegis Power: Alternative Investment in Wind Power
I know I would rather keep a fixed amount (months of expenses rahter than cash amount) in my warchest, pull of as much in dividends as I can and then use that if I want to invest. I would rather the warchest sit there doing nothing, knowing I have 18 months worth of money when I need it, than risk it for 6%
Leave a comment:
-
Investments
There are lots of posts regarding making your warchest work for you.
I just found this so thought I would post in case it's of any interest to anyone. I'm not promoting this.
Aegis Power: Alternative Investment in Wind PowerTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42

Leave a comment: