• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Beagle 2 found!

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Beagle 2 found!"

Collapse

  • GlenW
    replied
    Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post
    The reason why they didnt all deploy can only be speculated though.
    The production of the hinges had been outsourced to Mumbai.

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    interesting point about the panels not deploying, similar to the problems with the comet probe getting caught in the shade. Most probes have a nuclear power pack which seems to be a better bet, in terms of reliability
    They only tend to use the nuclear option for deep space missions where the sunlight isnt strong enough although Curiosity and other bigger probes on Mars are effectively nuclear powered.

    They use Plutonium 238 which has a half life of about 90 years and doesnt radiate as deadly a radiation as 239. So, any probes which may come into contact with alien life will not cause an inter galactic war.

    But bear in mind this mission was launched in 2002 / 3 as a last minute addition and on a very tight budget.

    The solar panels would have provided sufficient power for Beagle if they'd all deployed. The reason why they didnt all deploy can only be speculated though.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Coal then. They should have sent Fred Dibnah with a traction engine - proper British exploration effort.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    interesting point about the panels not deploying, similar to the problems with the comet probe getting caught in the shade. Most probes have a nuclear power pack which seems to be a better bet, in terms of reliability
    Perhaps the nuclear option is more complicated and expensive, and (if everything works) unnecessary as solar panels can do the job.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    interesting point about the panels not deploying, similar to the problems with the comet probe getting caught in the shade. Most probes have a nuclear power pack which seems to be a better bet, in terms of reliability
    Would be a bit of a pisser if we did find intelligent life and we dropped a nuclear powered probe on them that then blew up and killed them all. I'm pretty certain that's what happened with the dinosaurs.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post
    Except the news on Tuesday was an announcement about Beagle would be made Friday not that they had found it (although that was the speculation) or any other outcome.

    Joking apart, it appears the 3rd solar panel didnt deploy for some reason, preventing 2 other panels and the transmission aerial from deploying.

    Suspect is a puncturerd air cusshion on landing did some damage.

    Did they announce all this on Tuesday? Dont think so!
    interesting point about the panels not deploying, similar to the problems with the comet probe getting caught in the shade. Most probes have a nuclear power pack which seems to be a better bet, in terms of reliability

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Okay I'll let you off.

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    That is a shock.

    As long as you didn't read the news on Tuesday.
    Except the news on Tuesday was an announcement about Beagle would be made Friday not that they had found it (although that was the speculation) or any other outcome.

    Joking apart, it appears the 3rd solar panel didnt deploy for some reason, preventing 2 other panels and the transmission aerial from deploying.

    Suspect is a puncturerd air cusshion on landing did some damage.

    Did they announce all this on Tuesday? Dont think so!

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    That is a shock.

    As long as you didn't read the news on Tuesday.

    Leave a comment:


  • DannyF1966
    replied
    Makes you appreciate all the other projects that did succeed though, doesn't it? When we send out all these probes and robots to other planets, comets, moons etc, the ratio of successes to failures is actually amazingly high.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Beagle

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied


    Shame they didn't find out how close it had come to success before Colin Pillinger died, though

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    started a topic Beagle 2 found!

    Beagle 2 found!

    On Mars apparently. Who'd have thought?

Working...
X