
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: All filled internally!!!! Mmmmm
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "All filled internally!!!! Mmmmm"
Collapse
-
It's a strange thing, chasing for updates. If you are in the frame you rarely need to.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jmo21 View PostI guess it's the nicest rejection option, if we assume it's not true.
Other responses that would really annoy you would be:
- Oh we didn't read your email application
- We just picked the first 5 people who we could get hold of to put forward
- We thought you weren't qualified enough
Other "nice" rejections would be:
- the budget was pulled
- the project has been postponed
No debate on any of those, seen them all more times than I care to think.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scrag Meister View PostRecently was "put forward" for 3 different banking contracts with the same bank via different agents at the same recruitment firm.
All three, once prompted for an update, said the roles had been filled internally.
Smells like BS to me.
Leave a comment:
-
I guess it's the nicest rejection option, if we assume it's not true.
Other responses that would really annoy you would be:
- Oh we didn't read your email application
- We just picked the first 5 people who we could get hold of to put forward
- We thought you weren't qualified enough
Other "nice" rejections would be:
- the budget was pulled
- the project has been postponed
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scrag Meister View PostRecently was "put forward" for 3 different banking contracts with the same bank via different agents at the same recruitment firm.
All three, once prompted for an update, said the roles had been filled internally.
Smells like BS to me.
Leave a comment:
-
All filled internally!!!! Mmmmm
Recently was "put forward" for 3 different banking contracts with the same bank via different agents at the same recruitment firm.
All three, once prompted for an update, said the roles had been filled internally.
Smells like BS to me.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: