Originally posted by 7specialgems
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Unboomed
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Unboomed"
Collapse
-
Thanks. Good to know, and best of luck securing your next contract...onwards and upwards.
-
yeh sounds like it was always going to be a month but they know that advertise it as a month and no-ones interested.
Pretty tulipty way to do business.
Imagine contractor doing same. Starting a 3 month knowing in a months time they'll drop it because they've got something else starting. Client would go nuts if someone did this.
Leave a comment:
-
Some clients just keep you contracted until the work runs out and then serve notice. Happened to me a couple of times, both of which weren't particularly good payers.
Leave a comment:
-
Northrop Grumman?Originally posted by 7specialgems View PostNo, their cousins HQ'd in Virginia.
Leave a comment:
-
No, it isn't Lockheed - but duly noted (thanks for that) since Lockheed are local player to me here in South Hants.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostLockheed? They did it me years and years ago.
Would not work for them again if offered.
Leave a comment:
-
Lockheed? They did it me years and years ago.Originally posted by 7specialgems View PostTop 10 aerospace firm, American outfit. They know the game...
Would not work for them again if offered.Last edited by scooterscot; 2 October 2014, 15:50.
Leave a comment:
-
Nah, didn't realise they were also in Virginia though.Originally posted by zeitghostNSA?
Less Aerospace, more Defense I guess.
Leave a comment:
-
"Bob"? (forgive my ignorance)Originally posted by zemoxyl View PostIt's happened to me. Twice. Once at a major UK corp where they cut 90% of the contractors on site. Latterly Bob-filled as required.
Annoying : but goes with the territory.
Leave a comment:
-
No, their cousins HQ'd in Virginia.Originally posted by Churchill View PostLockheed by any chance?
Leave a comment:
-
It's happened to me. Twice. Once at a major UK corp where they cut 90% of the contractors on site. Latterly Bob-filled as required.
Annoying : but goes with the territory.
Leave a comment:
-
That's the way it goes
I once got taken on by a client for a six month project, but they hired me before it had got final approval. After a week, it was decided to postpone the project for at least six months, so I was suddenly surplus to requirements.
Onwards and upwards!
Leave a comment:
-
Lockheed by any chance?Originally posted by 7specialgems View PostI'm good for 12 months and I'll be taking at last one month off, I think
It's one of those things but the rigmarole of interviewing, IR35 assurance, then really going to ground with the domain and building relationships, only for it to transpire after five weeks that you were never going to be there beyond their Mythical Man Month "throw people at the problem" panic phase, leaves a bad taste.
It's a tulipy practice but it goes with the territory. Just wondered how rife it is...
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Today 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37


Leave a comment: