• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "So the west attacks Syria in the end...."

Collapse

  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Consider that the septics thought about using nukes in the Korean war but there was no target that was worthy of their use.

    There's even fewer targets somewhere that's largely desert.

    And it's a fecking expensive way of converting sand into glass.

    I'm as enthusiastic as the next GAL as regards frying the black flag flying nutjobs, but it's not a sensible use of resources.

    Though we have got about 250 tonnes of redundant Pu hanging around.
    Considering the stuff doesn't occur naturally, we've been busy!

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    And now the UK is:

    Terrorism threat levels
    The threat level indicates the likelihood of a terrorist attack in the UK.

    International threats
    The threat to the UK (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) from international terrorism is severe.

    Northern Ireland-related threats
    The threat to Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland) from Northern Ireland-related terrorism is moderate.

    The threat to Northern Ireland from Northern Ireland-related terrorism is severe.

    Threat levels
    There are 5 levels of threat:

    low - an attack is unlikely
    moderate - an attack is possible but not likely
    substantial - an attack is a strong possibility
    severe - an attack is highly likely
    critical - an attack is expected imminently

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    By bombing 2 cities they had proved they could build 2 big bombs in months. Even if shot down they would still turn a huge area into a wasteland.
    Thought they dropped 2 bombs as they wanted to compare the bang per bucks between a uranium gun-type atomic bomb (Little Boy Hiroshima) versus a plutonium implosion-type bomb (Fat Man Nagasaki)

    & it is the Nagasaki bombing that is the most controversial as they had already tested one at the Trinity site

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    The thing that's forgotten is that the Red Army had entered the war on Japan, something Stalin had promised once Germany had been dealt with. They managed to advance something like 100 miles in the first day - and that's what panicked the Japanese generals and led to their surrender. They were already losing against the US; they had no chance fighting Russia too.

    Tokyo had been destroyed by fire bombs, and 100,000 people killed in one night a few months before Hiroshima. So the idea that it was the nuclear bomb that ended the war doesn't quite add up. It doesn't really matter whether your enemy has one big bomb, or lots of little bombs, the result is the same. And actually, one big bomb might be preferable as you only have to shoot down one plane to stop the attack.
    from the Horses mouth

    Truman's Reflections on the Atomic Bombings | The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki | Historical Documents | atomicarchive.com

    Dropping the bombs ended the war, saved lives, and gave the free nations a chance to face the facts. When it looked as if Japan would quit, Russia hurried into the fray less than a week before the surrender, so as to be in at the settlement.
    By bombing 2 cities they had proved they could build 2 big bombs in months. Even if shot down they would still turn a huge area into a wasteland.

    MAD has kept peace amongst the major nations for nearly a century. Despite what credit NATO & the EU may claim.

    Leave a comment:


  • oscarose
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    Dont you just love Google Images

    +1

    feed jihadists to the pigs. only way. come on our boys, lets get stuck into the filth and blitz 'em.

    Leave a comment:


  • CheeseSlice
    replied
    Originally posted by oscarose View Post
    bury 'em alive in bacon

    Dont you just love Google Images

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Bradford
    Birmingham
    Most of London
    Glasgow
    Dundee
    West Dunbartonshire
    North Lanarkshire
    That could cause at least £50 worth of improvements, add Leicester to the list too.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Bradford
    Birmingham
    Most of London
    Glasgow
    Dundee
    West Dunbartonshire
    North Lanarkshire
    You live in the country.

    Your kids probably have sex.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    Once we're done blowing up Iraq and Syria, who else shall we bomb?.
    Bradford
    Birmingham
    Most of London
    Glasgow
    Dundee
    West Dunbartonshire
    North Lanarkshire

    Leave a comment:


  • oscarose
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    That is a disgusting idea you scumbag! Don't ever waste bacon like that!!!!
    No waste old boy. Let's fry this 'Islam State' with bacon strips.

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by oscarose View Post
    bury 'em alive in bacon

    That is a disgusting idea you scumbag! Don't ever waste bacon like that!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • oscarose
    replied
    bury 'em alive in bacon

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Batcher View Post
    I have the feeling that the A-bombs were used because America wanted to see the results as well as shortening the war. It was a live test.
    I think there's no doubt that was an element of it plus a sizeable lump of look at my big new scary toy waved at the Soviets.

    Did the A bombs also serve to cut short a bloody mess - impossible to say for certain, but I think that there's certainly an element of truth to it.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Batcher View Post
    It's true about the japanese fighting to the death and were the first to use suicide bombers.

    I have the feeling that the A-bombs were used because America wanted to see the results as well as shortening the war. It was a live test.
    The thing that's forgotten is that the Red Army had entered the war on Japan, something Stalin had promised once Germany had been dealt with. They managed to advance something like 100 miles in the first day - and that's what panicked the Japanese generals and led to their surrender. They were already losing against the US; they had no chance fighting Russia too.

    Tokyo had been destroyed by fire bombs, and 100,000 people killed in one night a few months before Hiroshima. So the idea that it was the nuclear bomb that ended the war doesn't quite add up. It doesn't really matter whether your enemy has one big bomb, or lots of little bombs, the result is the same. And actually, one big bomb might be preferable as you only have to shoot down one plane to stop the attack.

    Leave a comment:


  • GlenW
    replied
    Originally posted by Batcher View Post
    It's true about the japanese fighting to the death and were the first to use suicide bombers.

    I have the feeling that the A-bombs were used because America wanted to see the results as well as shortening the war. It was a live test.
    And, the Soviet Union had moved three armies east and were getting ready to invade Japan from the north. The good ole US of A couldn't let those reds get in on the action.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X