• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Independence for London?"

Collapse

  • Goatfell
    replied
    A++ to third world in a generation

    So London becomes independent, that would mean that:
    - Westminster would relocate to Manchester/Birmingham (somewhere more central in the UK certainly)
    - many of the support/parasitical/lobbying concerns would follow the government
    - all national bodies and institutions:- BoE, MOD, museums, BBC, CAA, The Monarchy PLC etc would have to relocate outside Londinium's borders
    - as Londinium will have seceded from the UK it would have to leave the EU removing it's advantages as a global finance centre
    - when new reservoir is established in Oxfordshire and the Thames rerouted the former river bed reverts to an open sewer
    - in an ironic twist of fate a new hub airport is built on reclaimed land in the former Thames estuary with the biggest tidal barrage in the world across the mouth

    All in all an excellent idea

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    He found it funny when they were asking if Scotland could protect itself, when London has had 7/7 and beheading, whereas we kicked the terrorists ass as Glasgow Airport.
    Cling onto that tight. It may get you through some tough times.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    He found it funny when they were asking if Scotland could protect itself, when London has had 7/7 and beheading, whereas we kicked the terrorists ass as Glasgow Airport.
    They kick anyone at Glasgow airport. The fact that they got a terrorist was pure accident

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Originally posted by Batcher View Post
    I wonder how long it would be after another 7/7 or a few beheadings on London streets before they asked to rejoin rUK?
    He found it funny when they were asking if Scotland could protect itself, when London has had 7/7 and beheading, whereas we kicked the terrorists ass as Glasgow Airport.

    Leave a comment:


  • Batcher
    replied
    I wonder how long it would be after another 7/7 or a few beheadings on London streets before they asked to rejoin rUK?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Good questions . Singapore seems to manage. as for footsoldier/cannon fodder we can always hire the unemployed from the regions to and do our fighting for us.
    Of course the main benefit would be not having London run by Scots with a track record of engaging in illegal wars and destroying the economy.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Sounds a good idea, couple of questions.

    1. What would happen if there was global banking crisis, would London have enough taxpayers to cover it's liability?
    2. So if London was attacked or involved in a war, can it raise an army. Or is the idea that London would back out of all wars and global projection of power?
    3. Does London have enough natural resources to sustain itself, so thinking about power, water etc.
    4. I thought one of the reasons that attracted outside investment to London was the stability of the UK?
    Good questions . Singapore seems to manage. as for footsoldier/cannon fodder we can always hire the unemployed from the regions to and do our fighting for us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    How is that any different to now?
    It isn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    iLondon would back wars that suited them without actually getting involved, own and control the natural resources in rUK and manipulate the rUK political classes.
    How is that any different to now?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    How would it do any of that?
    Capital.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    iLondon would back wars that suited them without actually getting involved, own and control the natural resources in rUK and manipulate the rUK political classes.
    How would it do any of that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Sounds a good idea, couple of questions.

    1. What would happen if there was global banking crisis, would London have enough taxpayers to cover it's liability?
    2. So if London was attacked or involved in a war, can it raise an army. Or is the idea that London would back out of all wars and global projection of power?
    3. Does London have enough natural resources to sustain itself, so thinking about power, water etc.
    4. I thought one of the reasons that attracted outside investment to London was the stability of the UK?
    iLondon would back wars that suited them without actually getting involved, own and control the natural resources in rUK and manipulate the rUK political classes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    It would need to use the Euro, as we wouldn't allow it to use the pound

    #reapwhatyousowbitches

    HTH
    Or it could use the London pound.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Sounds a good idea, couple of questions.

    1. What would happen if there was global banking crisis, would London have enough taxpayers to cover it's liability?
    2. So if London was attacked or involved in a war, can it raise an army. Or is the idea that London would back out of all wars and global projection of power?
    3. Does London have enough natural resources to sustain itself, so thinking about power, water etc.
    4. I thought one of the reasons that attracted outside investment to London was the stability of the UK?

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    It would need to use the Euro, as we wouldn't allow it to use the pound

    #reapwhatyousowbitches

    HTH

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X