• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The triumph of Blairism"

Collapse

  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio
    Actually, no not fine. Going back to my original ironic comment (remember irony?) it was Cambridge High School and Harrow Tech I attended, among my fourteen schools since my family were in the Forces and I got around a bit. I had four grammar schools (hint - don't change curriculum in the 5th form) and I always maintain I got an education and four decent science A levels despite school, not because of it. On the other hand, I've been reading since I was three, so perhaps some of it has stuck - I'm still a black belt at Trivial Pursuit (and agreed, that is not about intelligence, merely rote learning)

    So if you're sufficiently smart to hold yourself up as a comparator for good schooling, Mr Troll, you may have worked out that it's not clever to make unfounded assumptions.
    I must admit I am struggling a bit to see what your point is

    If your family were in the forces & moved around then surely you would have taken advantage of the assisted place scheme and gone (boarded?) to a Private School

    Are you saying that the 14 schools including Grammar included Comprehensives, and that in your opinion the Comprehensives were the equivalent of the Grammar schools?

    Or are you just suffering the effects of last-word-itus ?
    Last edited by Troll; 6 September 2006, 12:05.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn
    I don't think boasting about how clever you are on a public BB is a great sign of intelligence.


    Bloody huge though, my IQ. Enormous! A large portion!

    I must have got Prescott's share as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    No, of course it isn't. And you will notice I said "passed", I didn't say I joined - bunch of self-congratulatry wuckfits in my experience.

    Definition of an "intelligent terminal" by an ex-boss of mine - one that runs out of the room when you shout "FIRE"...

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I don't think boasting about how clever you are on a public BB is a great sign of intelligence.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    I passed a Mensa qualification test, so presumably I'm above average - but I agree that an intelligent guess can be made on most multiple choice questions.

    It's the old argument about what defines intelligence isn't it? I certainly don't think it's anything to do with IQ, that merely means you think the same way as the test setter. I prefer the biological assessment as being the abiltiy to correlate apparently unrelated bits of information to produce something new - chimp learns that ants climb sticks, chimp learns that sticks fit into holes in anthills, chimp works out that putting a stick in an anthill means you can get at the ants. But I doubt that chimp could predict the next in the sequence JFMAM... (assuming he spoke English!)

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    But what is your IQ? Mine's bloody large!

    And being good at quizzes is not all about rote learning. Many answers can be worked out, perhaps by elimination, or by recognising connections between facts.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Actually, no not fine. Going back to my original ironic comment (remember irony?) it was Cambridge High School and Harrow Tech I attended, among my fourteen schools since my family were in the Forces and I got around a bit. I had four grammar schools (hint - don't change curriculum in the 5th form) and I always maintain I got an education and four decent science A levels despite school, not because of it. On the other hand, I've been reading since I was three, so perhaps some of it has stuck - I'm still a black belt at Trivial Pursuit (and agreed, that is not about intelligence, merely rote learning)

    So if you're sufficiently smart to hold yourself up as a comparator for good schooling, Mr Troll, you may have worked out that it's not clever to make unfounded assumptions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    I went through comprehensive school while most of my freinds went through private and without a doubt I will be sending all my children to private. The private schools give you far more useful contacts than comprehensive schools and it's not what you know, it's who you know!

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by oraclesmith
    All grammar schools were going to be abolished years ago, when I went to school. Therefore I went to the local comprehensive and it was quite good - we had proper teachers that knew their stuff and a small percentage of us went to the 6th form and got A-levels.

    Your original comment "I take it you're a product of comprehensive education - I will adjust my postings accordingly" was not about the comprehensive system of today. You were implying that because someone has had a comprehensive education, that they were somehow less worthy or intelligent. In other words, Mr Troll, you are an intellectual snob.
    If you are happy with your experience with comprehensive education, then that's fine

    Leave a comment:


  • CaribbeanPirate
    replied
    <mode id="Old jokes are the best">
    I went to a good school - it was approved.
    </mode>

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    According to NL spin nothing:

    6. Record levels of literacy and numeracy in schools

    8. Funding for every pupil in England to double (since 1997) by 2007-08

    Would you agree with NL that the comprehensive system in the UK is producing world class students, easily employable and in demand by industry?
    Do you also subscribe to the NL view that selection is wrong and all Grammar schools should be abolished?
    Is your local comprehensive is so good that you would have no hesitation in sending your children there?
    All grammar schools were going to be abolished years ago, when I went to school. Therefore I went to the local comprehensive and it was quite good - we had proper teachers that knew their stuff and a small percentage of us went to the 6th form and got A-levels.

    Your original comment "I take it you're a product of comprehensive education - I will adjust my postings accordingly" was not about the comprehensive system of today. You were implying that because someone has had a comprehensive education, that they were somehow less worthy or intelligent. In other words, Mr Troll, you are an intellectual snob.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Did you know that in the UK more people work in Indian restraunts/takeaways than work in mining AND shipbuilding.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    1. Lowest inflation since the 60s
    2. Low interest rates
    3. Introduced the National Minimum Wage
    4. Record police numbers in England and Wales
    5. Cut overall crime by 35 per cent
    6. Record levels of literacy and numeracy in schools
    7. Best-ever primary school results
    8. Funding for every pupil in England to double (since 1997) by 2007-08
    9. Lowest unemployment for 29 years
    10. Written off up to 100 per cent of debt owed by poorest countries
    11. 78,700 more nurses
    12. 27,400 more doctors
    13. Brought back matrons to hospital wards
    14. Devolved power to the Scottish Parliament
    15. Devolved power to Welsh Assembly
    16. Banned anti-personnel mines
    17. NHS Direct offering free convenient patient advice at any time
    18. New Deal - helped over a million people into work
    19. Local government funding has increased by a third in real terms
    20. Equalised the age of consent for gay men
    21. Free entry to all national museums and galleries
    22. Overseas aid budget more than doubled
    23. Restored city-wide government to London
    24. Child benefit up 25 per cent since 1997
    25. Created Sure Start to help children from low income households
    26. Introduced the Disability Rights Commission
    27. £200 winter fuel payment to pensioners & extra £100 for over-80s
    28. The biggest rolling stock replacement programme ever seen on our railways
    29. Negotiated the historic Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland
    30. Over 30,000 more teachers in England schools
    31. Implemented the Freedom of Information Act
    32. All workers now have a right to 4 weeks’ paid holiday
    33. Record rises in the state pension
    34. 700,000 children lifted out of relative poverty
    35. Introduced child tax credit giving more money to parents
    36. Banned handguns
    37. Cut long-term youth unemployment by 75 per cent
    38. Free nursery places for three and four-year-olds in England, Scotland and Wales
    39. Free fruit for all four to six-year-olds at school
    40. Free school milk for five, six and seven-year-olds in Wales
    41. Record police numbers in Scotland
    42. Implemented the Human Rights Act
    43. Cleanest rivers, beaches, drinking water and air since the industrial revolution
    44. Free TV licences for over-75s
    45. Banned fur farming and the testing of cosmetics on animals
    46. Halved maximum waiting times for NHS operations
    47. Free local bus travel for over-60s
    48. Record number of students in higher education
    49. Extended the Race Relations Act so that all public bodies and functions now have a duty to promote race equality
    50. Five, six and seven-year-olds in class sizes of 30 or less
    Record spending, record legislating, record headlines. But to what effect? How has it changed what we see in the UK?

    Twenty questions

    1. Have improvements to the NHS been any better than negligible?
    2. Are children better educated now?
    3. Has crime gone down? Has gun crime gone down? Have detection rates gone up?
    4. Are we involved in less wars?
    5. Are there more jobs in private enterprise?
    6. Are there less taxpayer-funded state jobs?
    7. Have we got better funded pensions?
    8. Are people in less debt?
    9. Is the country balancing the books or even running a budget surplus?
    10. Are roads less crowded?
    11. Is public transport less crowded, and is it faster?
    12. Are there less racial tensions?
    13. Is immigration better controlled?
    14. Has the cost of our most basic and non-competitive supplies - water and power - gone up no more than wage inflation?
    15. Have constitutional changes helped anyone other than professional politicians?
    16. Has the freedom of information act stopped the government vetoing requests for information that is nothing to do with national security and everything to do with protecting Party interests?
    17. Is the environment any better, or even any policies in place to slow down its getting worse?
    18. Do we pay less tax now?
    19. Do the public have less form-filling and other red tape to cope with now?
    20. Are politicians more trusted now than they were in 1997?

    How did you do?

    0 Yeses - Well done
    1 to 5 Yeses - Everyone is entitled to the odd, diverse opinion
    6 to 10 Yeses - You aren't paying attention
    11 to 15 Yeses - You aren't very bright
    16 to 19 Yeses - You aren't paying attention and you aren't very bright
    20 Yeses - You are a lying government minister

    Leave a comment:


  • Nipple Clamp
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll
    Irony is a form of utterance that postulates a double audience, consisting of one party that hearing shall hear and shall not understand, and another party that, when more is meant than meets the ear, is aware, both of that “more” and of the outsider’s incomprehension.
    HTH
    But the party that hears and doesn't understand can be understood by both the other parties to be present only in their imagination.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Thatcher ruined the country I grew up in and loved, just as Bush is ruining that in which I now live. She spawned a generation for whom the making of money is the only measure of achievement, turned vices (greed, philistinism) into virtues (private enterprise, pragmatism), and did irrevocable damage to educational and cultural institutions. My parents' generation (75+) benefited not one whit from the Thatcher ecomonic revolution and are still eking out a living on their pensions. Did anyone say Northern Ireland or Falklands? What short memories we have. When she dies, show me her grave, hand me my dancing shoes, and strike up the band.
    Heh! Heh! Heh!

    We'll see about that, puny human!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X