• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "On an industrial scale"

Collapse

  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by tractor View Post
    Exactly and now, the morons have sunk it into a morass of swampland, bog standard indeed!
    I suspect a weak attempt at toilet humour. Misplaced, obviously.

    Whatever happened to the phrase "common or garden"?

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ..

    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    "Tool, entrenching, for the use of" was my introduction to the world of quartermaster descriptions.

    At the time it sounded daft but when I started work on stock control systems I realised that it was a way of classifying objects into a hierarchy.
    Exactly and now, the morons have sunk it into a morass of swampland, bog standard indeed!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by tractor View Post
    The one that gets me is when journalists, politicians and other 'educated' types say 'bog standard' when they mean run of the mill or average.

    The phrase originates from contract terms and was used extensively in the military where the quartermaster issuing kit would say something like 'Boots, durable moulded sole, size 9, bulk standard, 1 pr, for the use of.
    "Tool, entrenching, for the use of" was my introduction to the world of quartermaster descriptions.

    At the time it sounded daft but when I started work on stock control systems I realised that it was a way of classifying objects into a hierarchy.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Rather horrible thought. A conveyor belt of, hmmm no.

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I notice that the usage of 'on an industrial scale' is at a new high, dodgy tickets for football games and lost documents seem to be on an industrial scale this morning.

    'Not fit for practice' seems to be on the decrease.
    The one that gets me is when journalists, politicians and other 'educated' types say 'bog standard' when they mean run of the mill or average.

    The phrase originates from contract terms and was used extensively in the military where the quartermaster issuing kit would say something like 'Boots, durable moulded sole, size 9, bulk standard, 1 pr, for the use of.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    started a topic On an industrial scale

    On an industrial scale

    I notice that the usage of 'on an industrial scale' is at a new high, dodgy tickets for football games and lost documents seem to be on an industrial scale this morning.

    'Not fit for practice' seems to be on the decrease.

Working...
X