Sorted
Agency chased me up at the beginning of the week as the contract start is imminent. I re-iterated that I wasn't happy signing the forms as they stood, and this time he asked me if I would re-word them to something I was happy to sign and then he would pass them to the client to verify they were happy.
Have now done this, client has accepted (and admitted they need to change the default wording in future).
Result
(would have been nice if the agent had let me do it in the first place though...)
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: NDA specifies agency employee
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "NDA specifies agency employee"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Dominic Connor View PostIf you had a decent agent, he'd ring legal at the client and point out that a mis-statement like this might invalidate the NDA since you simply aren't an employee and certainly leaves the client open to various IR35 and employment law hassles.
Since you don't have a decent agent, have you tried contacting their inhouse legal or if all else fails HR ?
How do you demonstrate intention in a situation like this you may be wondering?
A suitable email to your agent confirming that the NDA is badly worded but that you're signing this anyway as a non employee since you fully understand the client's need to address the issue of non disclosure. This has you nicely covered should any future issues arise.
Then as advised elsewhere, file in the 3 month retention pile and get on with the gig
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI think Dominic's point is first thing to do and actually correct the document to fit the situation. Point out to the client that the incorrect terminology could render it completely unenforceable and pointless. If they don't back down then I wouldn't worry about signing it too much. While HMRC might wave it about it will be very easy to point out it is a wording error but the reason for signing it is still valid and is applicable to anyone, permies, subcontractors, 3rd parties etc so has no bearing on your relationship with the client or employment status.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Taita View PostI don't think signing a badly drafted form in any way impinges on your real status as a contractor. You are just agreeing (as an individual) to not disclose the client's confidential information.
The only purposes of the document are to re-inforce the rules in your mind and to confirm that you had been made aware of them. Otherwise they could have a single document (agreement) with the agency obliging the agency to bind all their employees/contractors etc to the NDA conditions.
Leave a comment:
-
Ring legal
If you had a decent agent, he'd ring legal at the client and point out that a mis-statement like this might invalidate the NDA since you simply aren't an employee and certainly leaves the client open to various IR35 and employment law hassles.
Since you don't have a decent agent, have you tried contacting their inhouse legal or if all else fails HR ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dark Black View PostFinally have a start date for the contract that was offered an age ago. Contract paperwork is fine and the same as I've used (and reviewed) previously so no worries there.
However, I've also been asked to sign a <ClientCo> NDA (of which I have no problem at all in principle). The problem is that the declaration I have sign states that I am an employee of the agency.
Now clearly this a <ClientCo> standard document for temporary workers, but that doesn't fit for contractors. I'm not happy signing what is actually a false statement - i.e. I'm not an employer of the agency. Wouldn't this be a fraudulent statement?
I have discussed this with the agent (I've worked with them before for other clients, and always found them to be one of the better agencies around) but they say the client won't accept altered forms (e.g crossing out employee and replacing with the word contractor). Apparently someone did it before and it was caught and rejected.
Likewise apparently this is the only NDA for non-employees that the client uses.
I know I can just refuse and walk but I could do with the work since I'm still finding the market quiet. Opinions?
p.s. I'm aware there are other threads discussing similar but all seemed to relate the NDA itself not the "employee" issue
The only purposes of the document are to re-inforce the rules in your mind and to confirm that you had been made aware of them. Otherwise they could have a single document (agreement) with the agency obliging the agency to bind all their employees/contractors etc to the NDA conditions.
Leave a comment:
-
I always sign stuff like that thus:
Moscow Mule
Director
Mule Enterprises Ltd.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostCross out Employee, replace it with Sub Contractor, initial it and return
Leave a comment:
-
Cross out Employee, replace it with Sub Contractor, initial it and return
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dark Black View PostFinally have a start date for the contract that was offered an age ago. Contract paperwork is fine and the same as I've used (and reviewed) previously so no worries there.
However, I've also been asked to sign a <ClientCo> NDA (of which I have no problem at all in principle). The problem is that the declaration I have sign states that I am an employee of the agency.
Now clearly this a <ClientCo> standard document for temporary workers, but that doesn't fit for contractors. I'm not happy signing what is actually a false statement - i.e. I'm not an employer of the agency. Wouldn't this be a fraudulent statement?
I have discussed this with the agent (I've worked with them before for other clients, and always found them to be one of the better agencies around) but they say the client won't accept altered forms (e.g crossing out employee and replacing with the word contractor). Apparently someone did it before and it was caught and rejected.
Likewise apparently this is the only NDA for non-employees that the client uses.
I know I can just refuse and walk but I could do with the work since I'm still finding the market quiet. Opinions?
p.s. I'm aware there are other threads discussing similar but all seemed to relate the NDA itself not the "employee" issue
Dark Black
Company Director
Dark Black Co.
Hard to see fraud there. Forget it and get on with invoiceing.
Leave a comment:
-
NDA specifies agency employee
Finally have a start date for the contract that was offered an age ago. Contract paperwork is fine and the same as I've used (and reviewed) previously so no worries there.
However, I've also been asked to sign a <ClientCo> NDA (of which I have no problem at all in principle). The problem is that the declaration I have sign states that I am an employee of the agency.
Now clearly this a <ClientCo> standard document for temporary workers, but that doesn't fit for contractors. I'm not happy signing what is actually a false statement - i.e. I'm not an employer of the agency. Wouldn't this be a fraudulent statement?
I have discussed this with the agent (I've worked with them before for other clients, and always found them to be one of the better agencies around) but they say the client won't accept altered forms (e.g crossing out employee and replacing with the word contractor). Apparently someone did it before and it was caught and rejected.
Likewise apparently this is the only NDA for non-employees that the client uses.
I know I can just refuse and walk but I could do with the work since I'm still finding the market quiet. Opinions?
p.s. I'm aware there are other threads discussing similar but all seemed to relate the NDA itself not the "employee" issueTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: